Corry R J, Thompson J S, Freeman R M, Colville D S
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1978 Apr;146(4):519-23.
Survival statistics of 163 cadaver and 60 live related donor renal transplants from a single center were analyzed. Survival rates at one, two and three years for 38 first cadaver transplants matched for a haplotype and 34 first live related donor haplotype matched kidneys were virtually the same. In addition, nine, four antigen matched cadaver transplants had a comparable survival rate at one, two and three years to the larger group of 25 HL-A identical live related donor kidneys. When poor risk cadaver recipients were excluded from the entire cadaver group, the graft survival rate approached that of the live related group at one year but declined more rapidly at two and three years than did the live related donor group. Thus, cadaver renal transplantation in this series appears to be an alternative to comparably matched live related donor transplants. An increased effort should be made to identify and use brain death cadaver donors for transplantation. As more donors become available and national sharing systems are improved, a strong case can be made to avoid the use of live related donor kidneys, except in instances of a perfect match.
分析了来自单一中心的163例尸体肾移植和60例活体亲属供肾移植的存活统计数据。38例单倍型匹配的首次尸体肾移植和34例单倍型匹配的首次活体亲属供肾在1年、2年和3年的存活率几乎相同。此外,9例、4例抗原匹配的尸体肾移植在1年、2年和3年的存活率与25例HL - A全相同的活体亲属供肾的较大组相当。当将高风险尸体肾受者从整个尸体肾组中排除时,移植肾存活率在1年时接近活体亲属组,但在2年和3年时比活体亲属供肾组下降得更快。因此,本系列中的尸体肾移植似乎是可比匹配的活体亲属供肾移植的一种替代方法。应加大力度识别和使用脑死亡尸体供者进行移植。随着更多供者可供使用且全国共享系统得到改善,除了在完全匹配的情况下,有充分理由避免使用活体亲属供肾。