Institute of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University Hospital Munich, Munich, Germany.
Institute of Pathology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J Pathol. 2022 Jan;256(1):61-70. doi: 10.1002/path.5808. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
Cutaneous, ocular, and mucosal melanomas are histologically indistinguishable tumors that are driven by a different spectrum of genetic alterations. With current methods, identification of the site of origin of a melanoma metastasis is challenging. DNA methylation profiling has shown promise for the identification of the site of tumor origin in various settings. Here we explore the DNA methylation landscape of melanomas from different sites and analyze if different melanoma origins can be distinguished by their epigenetic profile. We performed DNA methylation analysis, next generation DNA panel sequencing, and copy number analysis of 82 non-cutaneous and 25 cutaneous melanoma samples. We further analyzed eight normal melanocyte cell culture preparations. DNA methylation analysis separated uveal melanomas from melanomas of other primary sites. Mucosal, conjunctival, and cutaneous melanomas shared a common global DNA methylation profile. Still, we observed location-dependent DNA methylation differences in cancer-related genes, such as low frequencies of RARB (7/63) and CDKN2A promoter methylation (6/63) in mucosal melanomas, or a high frequency of APC promoter methylation in conjunctival melanomas (6/9). Furthermore, all investigated melanomas of the paranasal sinus showed loss of PTEN expression (9/9), mainly caused by promoter methylation. This was less frequently seen in melanomas of other sites (24/98). Copy number analysis revealed recurrent amplifications in mucosal melanomas, including chromosomes 4q, 5p, 11q and 12q. Most melanomas of the oral cavity showed gains of chromosome 5p with TERT amplification (8/10), while 11q amplifications were enriched in melanomas of the nasal cavity (7/16). In summary, mucosal, conjunctival, and cutaneous melanomas show a surprisingly similar global DNA methylation profile and identification of the site of origin by DNA methylation testing is likely not feasible. Still, our study demonstrates tumor location-dependent differences of promoter methylation frequencies in specific cancer-related genes together with tumor site-specific enrichment for specific chromosomal changes and genetic mutations. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
皮肤、眼部和黏膜黑色素瘤在组织学上无法区分,但它们由不同的遗传改变驱动。目前的方法,确定黑色素瘤转移的起源部位具有挑战性。DNA 甲基化分析已显示出在不同环境下确定肿瘤起源部位的潜力。在此,我们探索了不同部位黑色素瘤的 DNA 甲基化图谱,并分析了不同的黑色素瘤起源是否可以通过其表观遗传特征来区分。我们对 82 例非皮肤黑色素瘤和 25 例皮肤黑色素瘤样本进行了 DNA 甲基化分析、下一代 DNA 面板测序和拷贝数分析。我们还进一步分析了 8 例正常黑素细胞培养物。DNA 甲基化分析将葡萄膜黑色素瘤与其他原发性部位的黑色素瘤区分开来。黏膜、结膜和皮肤黑色素瘤具有共同的全局 DNA 甲基化特征。然而,我们观察到与癌症相关基因的位置依赖性 DNA 甲基化差异,例如黏膜黑色素瘤中 RARB(7/63)和 CDKN2A 启动子甲基化频率低(6/63),或结膜黑色素瘤中 APC 启动子甲基化频率高(6/9)。此外,所有研究的鼻窦旁黑色素瘤均表现出 PTEN 表达缺失(9/9),主要由启动子甲基化引起。在其他部位的黑色素瘤中,这种情况较少见(24/98)。拷贝数分析显示,黏膜黑色素瘤中存在染色体 4q、5p、11q 和 12q 的反复扩增。大多数口腔黑色素瘤显示染色体 5p 获得和 TERT 扩增(8/10),而鼻腔黑色素瘤中 11q 扩增富集(7/16)。总之,黏膜、结膜和皮肤黑色素瘤显示出惊人相似的全局 DNA 甲基化谱,通过 DNA 甲基化测试确定起源部位可能不可行。尽管如此,我们的研究表明,在特定与癌症相关的基因中,启动子甲基化频率存在与肿瘤部位相关的差异,同时存在与肿瘤部位特异性相关的特定染色体变化和基因突变富集。