Amick Ashley E, Feinsmith Sarah E, Sell Jordan, Davis Evan M, Wayne Diane B, Feinglass Joseph, Barsuk Jeffrey H
From the Department of Internal Medicine and Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Niehoff School of Nursing, Loyola University.
J Patient Saf. 2022 Apr 1;18(3):e697-e703. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000910.
Difficult intravenous (IV) access (DIVA) is a prevalent condition in the hospital setting and increases utilization of midline catheters (MCs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous (USGPIV) insertion is effective at establishing intravenous access in DIVA but remains understudied in the inpatient setting. We evaluated the effect of an USGPIV simulation-based mastery learning (SBML) curriculum for nurses on MC and PICC utilization for hospitalized patients.
We performed a quasi-experimental observational study. We trained nurses across all inpatient units at a large tertiary care hospital. We queried the electronic medical record to compare PICC and MC utilization for patients with DIVA during 3 periods: before USGPIV SBML training (control), during pilot testing of the intervention, and during the SBML intervention. To account for variations in insertion practices over time, we performed an interrupted time series (ITS) analysis between 2 periods, the combined control and pilot periods and the intervention period.
One hundred forty-eight nurses completed USGPIV SBML training. Midline catheters inserted monthly per 1000 patient-days for DIVA decreased significantly from 1.86 ± 0.51 (control) to 2.31 ± 0.28 (pilot) to 1.33 ± 0.51 (intervention; P = 0.001). The ITS analysis indicated a significant intervention effect (P < 0.001). Peripherally inserted central catheters inserted monthly per 1000 patient-days for DIVA also significantly decreased over the study periods; however, the ITS failed to show an intervention effect as PICC insertions were already decreasing during the control period.
A hospital-wide USGPIV SBML curriculum for inpatient nurses was associated with a significant reduction in MCs inserted for DIVA.
静脉穿刺困难(DIVA)在医院环境中普遍存在,会增加中线导管(MC)和外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)的使用。超声引导下外周静脉穿刺(USGPIV)在DIVA患者中建立静脉通路有效,但在住院患者中研究较少。我们评估了基于USGPIV模拟的掌握学习(SBML)课程对护士的影响,以及对住院患者MC和PICC使用情况的影响。
我们进行了一项准实验性观察研究。我们在一家大型三级护理医院对所有住院科室的护士进行培训。我们查询电子病历,比较DIVA患者在三个时期的PICC和MC使用情况:USGPIV SBML培训前(对照)、干预试点测试期间和SBML干预期间。为了考虑不同时期穿刺操作的差异,我们在两个时期之间进行了中断时间序列(ITS)分析,即对照和试点合并期与干预期。
148名护士完成了USGPIV SBML培训。每1000患者日中DIVA患者每月插入的中线导管数量从1.86±0.51(对照)显著降至2.31±0.28(试点),再降至1.33±0.51(干预;P = 0.001)。ITS分析显示干预效果显著(P < 0.001)。每1000患者日中DIVA患者每月插入的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管数量在研究期间也显著下降;然而,由于对照期PICC插入量已经在下降,ITS未能显示出干预效果。
针对住院护士的全院范围USGPIV SBML课程与DIVA患者插入的MC数量显著减少相关。