Cunliffe Alexander J, Askew Peter D, Stephan Ina, Iredale Gillian, Cosemans Patrick, Simmons Lisa M, Verran Joanna, Redfern James
Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Manchester Metropolitan University, Chester Street, Manchester M1 5GD, UK.
(Industrial Microbiological Services Ltd.) IMSL, Pale Lane, Hartley Whitney, Hants RG27 8DH, UK.
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Sep 3;10(9):1069. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091069.
Materials that confer antimicrobial activity, be that by innate property, leaching of biocides or design features (e.g., non-adhesive materials) continue to gain popularity to combat the increasing and varied threats from microorganisms, e.g., replacing inert surfaces in hospitals with copper. To understand how efficacious these materials are at controlling microorganisms, data is usually collected via a standardised test method. However, standardised test methods vary, and often the characteristics and methodological choices can make it difficult to infer that any perceived antimicrobial activity demonstrated in the laboratory can be confidently assumed to an end-use setting. This review provides a critical analysis of standardised methodology used in academia and industry, and demonstrates how many key methodological choices (e.g., temperature, humidity/moisture, airflow, surface topography) may impact efficacy assessment, highlighting the need to carefully consider intended antimicrobial end-use of any product.
具有抗菌活性的材料,无论是因其固有特性、杀菌剂的浸出还是设计特点(如非粘性材料),都在不断受到欢迎,以应对来自微生物的日益增加和多样的威胁,例如用铜取代医院中的惰性表面。为了了解这些材料在控制微生物方面的效果如何,通常通过标准化测试方法收集数据。然而,标准化测试方法各不相同,而且其特性和方法选择往往使得难以推断在实验室中所显示的任何抗菌活性在实际应用环境中也能可靠地实现。本综述对学术界和工业界使用的标准化方法进行了批判性分析,并展示了许多关键的方法选择(如温度、湿度/水分、气流、表面形貌)可能如何影响疗效评估,强调了仔细考虑任何产品预期抗菌最终用途的必要性。