Suppr超能文献

姑息性放疗治疗胃癌出血的疗效观察:一项多中心前瞻性观察研究(JROSG 17-3)。

Treatment response after palliative radiotherapy for bleeding gastric cancer: a multicenter prospective observational study (JROSG 17-3).

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Arao Municipal Hospital, 2600, Arao, Arao-shi, Kumamoto, 864-0041, Japan.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Fujieda Municipal General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2022 Mar;25(2):411-421. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01254-w. Epub 2021 Sep 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Palliative radiotherapy seems to be rarely performed for incurable gastric cancer. In this first multicenter study, we examined the effectiveness of palliative radiotherapy and investigated whether biologically effective dose (BED) is associated with survival, response, or re-bleeding.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included blood transfusion or hemoglobin levels < 8.0 g/dL. The primary endpoint was the intention-to-treat (ITT) bleeding response rate at 4 weeks. Response entailed all of the following criteria: (i) hemoglobin levels ≥ 8.0 g/dL; (ii) 7 consecutive days without blood transfusion anytime between enrollment and blood sampling; and (iii) no salvage treatment (surgery, endoscopic treatment, transcatheter embolization, or re-irradiation) for bleeding gastric cancer. Re-bleeding was defined as the need for blood transfusion or salvage treatment.

RESULTS

We enrolled 55 patients from 15 institutions. The ITT response rates were 47%, 53%, and 49% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively. The per-protocol response rates were 56%, 78%, and 90% at 2, 4, and 8 weeks, respectively. Neither response nor BED (α/β = 10) predicted overall survival. Multivariable Fine-Gray model showed that BED was not a significant predictor of response. Univariable Cox model showed that BED was not significantly associated with re-bleeding. Grades 1, 2, 3, and, ≥ 4 radiation-related adverse events were reported in 11, 9, 1, and 0 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The per-protocol response rate increased to 90% during the 8-week follow-up. The frequent occurrence of death starting shortly after enrollment lowered the ITT response rate. BED was not associated with survival, bleeding response, or re-bleeding.

摘要

背景

姑息性放疗似乎很少用于治疗无法治愈的胃癌。在这项首次多中心研究中,我们检查了姑息性放疗的效果,并研究了生物有效剂量(BED)是否与生存、反应或再出血相关。

方法

纳入标准包括输血或血红蛋白水平<8.0 g/dL。主要终点是意向治疗(ITT)4 周时的出血反应率。反应需要满足以下所有标准:(i)血红蛋白水平≥8.0 g/dL;(ii)入组和采血期间至少连续 7 天无需输血;(iii)无用于治疗出血性胃癌的补救治疗(手术、内镜治疗、经导管栓塞或再放疗)。再出血定义为需要输血或补救治疗。

结果

我们从 15 家机构纳入了 55 名患者。ITT 反应率分别为 2 周时的 47%、4 周时的 53%和 8 周时的 49%。方案规定的反应率分别为 2 周时的 56%、4 周时的 78%和 8 周时的 90%。反应率和 BED(α/β=10)均不能预测总生存期。多变量 Fine-Gray 模型显示 BED 不是反应的显著预测因素。单变量 Cox 模型显示 BED 与再出血无显著相关性。11、9、1 和 0 名患者分别报告了 1、2、3 和≥4 级与放疗相关的不良事件。

结论

方案规定的反应率在 8 周随访期间增加到 90%。入组后不久死亡的频繁发生降低了 ITT 反应率。BED 与生存、出血反应或再出血无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验