Suppr超能文献

新型人体心房速聚集多点非接触标测:从计算模型到临床验证。

Novel aggregated multiposition noncontact mapping of atrial tachycardia in humans: From computational modeling to clinical validation.

机构信息

Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Heart Rhythm Centre, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guys & St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Royal Papworth Hospital, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.09.025. Epub 2021 Sep 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A novel aggregated multiposition noncontact mapping (AMP-NCM) algorithm is proposed to diagnose cardiac arrhythmias.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to computationally determine an accuracy threshold and to compare the accuracy and clinical utility of AMP-NCM to gold standard contact mapping.

METHODS

In a cellular automata model, the number of catheter positions and chamber coverage were varied to establish accuracy requirements for clinically relevant AMP-NCM. This guided the clinical study protocol. In a prospective cohort of patients with atrial tachycardia (AT), noncontact mapping (NCM) recordings from a single position (SP) and multiple positions were compared to contact mapping with a high-density multipolar catheter using morphology and timing differences of reconstructed signals. Identification of AT mechanisms and ablation targets using both AMP-NCM and contact mapping were randomly evaluated by 5 blinded reviewers.

RESULTS

AMP-NCM accuracy was asymptotic at 60 catheter positions in computational modeling. Twenty patients (age 65 ± 12 years; 19 male) with 26 ATs (5 focal, 21 reentrant) were studied. Morphologic correlation of signals derived from AMP-NCM was significantly better than those from SP-NCM compared to contact signals (median 0.93 vs 0.76; P <.001). AMP-NCM generated maps more rapidly than contact mapping (3 ± 1 minutes vs 13 ± 6 minutes; P <.001) and correctly diagnosed AT mechanisms in 25 of 26 maps (96%). Overall, 80% of arrhythmia mechanisms were correctly identified using AMP-NCM by blinded reviewers.

CONCLUSION

Once 60 catheter positions were achieved, AMP-NCM successfully diagnosed mechanisms of AT and identified treatment sites equal to gold standard contact mapping in 3 minutes of procedural time.

摘要

背景

提出了一种新的聚集多点非接触式标测(AMP-NCM)算法,用于诊断心律失常。

目的

本研究旨在计算出准确性阈值,并比较 AMP-NCM 与金标准接触式标测的准确性和临床实用性。

方法

在细胞自动机模型中,改变导管位置的数量和腔室覆盖率,以确定临床相关 AMP-NCM 的准确性要求。这指导了临床研究方案。在接受心房性心动过速(AT)的前瞻性队列研究中,使用形态学和重构信号的时间差异,比较单部位(SP)和多部位的非接触式标测(NCM)记录与高密度多极导管的接触式标测。使用 AMP-NCM 和接触式标测随机评估 5 位盲审员对 AT 机制和消融靶点的识别。

结果

在计算模型中,AMP-NCM 的准确性在 60 个导管位置时达到了渐近线。研究了 20 例年龄 65 ± 12 岁(19 例男性)的患者,共 26 例 AT(5 例局灶性,21 例折返性)。与接触式信号相比,来自 AMP-NCM 的信号的形态相关性明显优于来自 SP-NCM 的信号(中位数 0.93 比 0.76;P <.001)。与接触式标测相比,AMP-NCM 生成的图谱更快(3 ± 1 分钟比 13 ± 6 分钟;P <.001),并且在 26 个图谱中的 25 个(96%)正确诊断了 AT 机制。总体而言,80%的心律失常机制通过盲审员使用 AMP-NCM 正确识别。

结论

一旦达到 60 个导管位置,AMP-NCM 就可以成功诊断 AT 的机制,并在 3 分钟的手术时间内确定与金标准接触式标测相同的治疗部位。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验