Sun Yuanze, Duan Chongxue, Cao Na, Li Xinfei, Li Xiaomin, Chen Yumei, Huang Yi, Wang Jie
Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
Institute of Quality Standard and Testing Technology for Agro-Products, The Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Beijing 100081, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 2):150516. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150516. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
Increasing research has recognized that the ubiquitous presence of microplastics in terrestrial environments is undeniable, which potentially alters the soil ecosystem properties and processes. The fact that microplastics with diverse characteristics enter into the soil may induce distinct effects on soil ecosystems. Our knowledge of the impacts of microplastics with different polymers, shapes, and concentrations on soil bacterial communities is still limited. To address this, we examined the effects of spherical microplastics (150 μm) with different polymers (i.e., polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), and polypropylene (PP)) and four shapes of PP microplastics (i.e., fiber, film, foam, and particle) at a constant concentration (1%, w/w) on the soil bacterial community in an agricultural soil over 60 days. Treatments with different concentrations (0.01-20%, w/w) of PP microplastic particles (150 μm) were also included. The bacterial communities in PE and PP treatments showed a similar pattern but separated from those in PS-treated soils, indicating the polymer backbone structure is an important factor modulating the soil bacterial responses. Fiber, foam, and film microplastics significantly affected the soil bacterial composition as compared to the particle. The community dissimilarity of soil bacteria was significantly (R = 0.592, p < 0.001) correlated with the changes of microplastic concentration. The random forest model identified that certain bacteria belonging to Patescibacteria were closely linked to microplastic contamination. Additionally, analysis of the predicted function further showed that microplastics with different characteristics caused distinct effects on microbial community function. Our findings suggested that the idiosyncrasies of microplastics should not be neglected when studying their effects on terrestrial ecosystems.
越来越多的研究认识到,微塑料在陆地环境中普遍存在是不可否认的,这可能会改变土壤生态系统的性质和过程。具有不同特性的微塑料进入土壤这一事实可能会对土壤生态系统产生不同的影响。我们对于不同聚合物、形状和浓度的微塑料对土壤细菌群落影响的认识仍然有限。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了在60天内,不同聚合物(即聚乙烯(PE)、聚苯乙烯(PS)和聚丙烯(PP))的球形微塑料(150μm)以及四种形状的PP微塑料(即纤维、薄膜、泡沫和颗粒)在恒定浓度(1%,w/w)下对农业土壤中细菌群落的影响。还设置了不同浓度(0.01 - 20%,w/w)的PP微塑料颗粒(150μm)处理组。PE和PP处理组中的细菌群落呈现出相似的模式,但与PS处理土壤中的细菌群落分离,这表明聚合物主链结构是调节土壤细菌反应的一个重要因素。与颗粒状微塑料相比,纤维、泡沫和薄膜状微塑料对土壤细菌组成有显著影响。土壤细菌群落的差异与微塑料浓度的变化显著相关(R = 0.592,p < 0.001)。随机森林模型确定,某些属于Patescibacteria的细菌与微塑料污染密切相关。此外,对预测功能的分析进一步表明,不同特性的微塑料对微生物群落功能产生不同的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在研究微塑料对陆地生态系统的影响时,其特性不容忽视。