Survey of the RhD selection and issuing practices for uncrossmatched blood products at pediatric trauma hospitals in the United States: The BEST collaborative study.

BACKGROUND

As evidence demonstrating the importance of early transfusions in trauma resuscitation accumulates, when RhD-negative products might not be available, it is important to understand the nature of the RhD-type of products provided to bleeding pediatric patients of potentially unknown RhD-type.

METHODS

A survey link was electronically sent to the transfusion service medical director and/or laboratory manager at American pediatric Level I and Level II hospitals inquiring about their practices for selecting RhD-type of uncrossmatched red blood cells (RBC) or low titer group O whole blood (LTOWB) for boys and girls.

RESULTS

There were 55/117 (47.0%) analyzable responses; 43/55 (78.2%) from Level I and 12/55 (21.8%) from Level II hospitals. For in hospital transfusions, 51/55 (92.7%) of centers use only RhD-negative blood products to resuscitate girls ≤18 years old while 30/55 (54.5%) of centers do the same for boys ≤18 years old. Most centers 41/55(74.5%) store RBCs and/or LTOWB in in-hospital remote refrigerators; 27 store only RhD-negative RBCs and 2 store only RhD-negative LTOWB units in these refrigerators. A total of 24/55 (43.6%) centers have RBCs and/or LTOWB available on road ambulances or helicopters for prehospital transfusion; 12 transport only RhD-negative RBCs and two transport only RhD-negative LTOWB. Most centers, 35/55 (63.6%), address the prophylaxis of an RhD-negative female recipient of RhD-positive transfusion on a case-by-case basis.

CONCLUSION

While there is some variability, most of the responding pediatric trauma centers routinely utilized RhD-negative RBCs for emergency transfusion for patients ≤18 years old of unknown RhD-type.