Miyoshi Takanori, Miyashita Hiroo, Matsuo Naomi, Odawara Miki, Hori Minako, Hiraki Yoichi, Kawanaka Hirofumi
Department of Pharmacy, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center.
Department of Pharmacy, National Hospital Organization Beppu Medical Center.
Biol Pharm Bull. 2021;44(10):1413-1418. doi: 10.1248/bpb.b21-00198.
The triplet antiemetic regimen is administered to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). However, the superiority of palonosetron over first-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists in triplet antiemetic therapy remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of palonosetron (PALO) and granisetron (GRA) in triplet antiemetic therapy for CINV. This study included 267 patients who received MEC at our hospital between April 2017 and September 2020. Patients were pretreated with antiemetic therapy comprising PALO or GRA and dexamethasone on day 1 and aprepitant on days 1-3. We evaluated the rate of complete response (CR) (i.e., no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) in the acute phase (0-24 h), delayed phase (24-120 h), and overall phase (0-120 h) after first-cycle chemotherapy. Furthermore, multivariate analysis was conducted to identify risk factors for non-CR. The rate of CR in the overall and delayed phases was significantly higher in the PALO group (91.9 and 91.9%, respectively) than in the GRA group (74.1 and 75.5%, respectively). In the acute phase, the incidence was not different between the GRA and PALO groups (96.5 and 99.2%, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed that female sex and the use of GRA were risk factors for non-CR. Subgroup analysis revealed the superiority of PALO over GRA in female patients, but not in male patients. In conclusion, PALO was more effective than GRA in triplet antiemetic therapy in preventing CINV during MEC, especially for female patients.
三联抗呕吐方案用于预防中度致吐性化疗(MEC)后化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)。然而,在三联抗呕吐治疗中,帕洛诺司琼相对于第一代5-羟色胺-3受体拮抗剂的优越性仍不明确。在本研究中,我们评估了帕洛诺司琼(PALO)和格拉司琼(GRA)在三联抗呕吐治疗CINV中的疗效。本研究纳入了2017年4月至2020年9月期间在我院接受MEC的267例患者。患者在第1天接受包含PALO或GRA和地塞米松的抗呕吐治疗预处理,并在第1 - 3天接受阿瑞匹坦治疗。我们评估了首个化疗周期后急性期(0 - 24小时)、延迟期(24 - 120小时)和全期(0 - 120小时)的完全缓解(CR)率(即无呕吐且未使用救援药物)。此外,进行多因素分析以确定非CR的危险因素。PALO组在全期和延迟期的CR率(分别为91.9%和91.9%)显著高于GRA组(分别为74.1%和75.5%)。在急性期,GRA组和PALO组的发生率无差异(分别为96.5%和99.2%)。多因素分析显示,女性和使用GRA是非CR的危险因素。亚组分析显示,PALO在女性患者中优于GRA,但在男性患者中并非如此。总之,在三联抗呕吐治疗中,PALO在预防MEC期间的CINV方面比GRA更有效,尤其是对女性患者。