Braasch Joseph E, Di Santo Lionel N, Tarble Zachary J, Prasifka Jarrad R, Hamilton Jill A
Department of Biological Sciences North Dakota State University Fargo ND USA.
Edward T. Schafer Agricultural Research Center USDA-ARS Fargo ND USA.
Evol Appl. 2021 Jul 19;14(9):2206-2220. doi: 10.1111/eva.13275. eCollection 2021 Sep.
Globally imperiled ecosystems often depend upon collection, propagation, and storage of seed material for use in restoration. However, during the restoration process demographic changes, population bottlenecks, and selection can alter the genetic composition of seed material, with potential impacts for restoration success. The evolutionary outcomes associated with these processes have been demonstrated using theoretical and experimental frameworks, but no study to date has examined their impact on the seed material maintained for conservation and restoration. In this study, we compare genomic variation across seed sources used in conservation and restoration for the perennial prairie plant , a key component of restorations across North American grasslands. We compare individuals sourced from contemporary wild populations, conservation collections, commercially produced restoration material, and two populations selected for agronomic traits. Overall, we observed that and contemporary wild populations exhibited similar genomic composition, while four of five commercial populations and selected lines were differentiated from each other and other seed source populations. Genomic differences across seed sources could not be explained solely by isolation by distance nor directional selection. We did find evidence of sampling effects for collections, which exhibited significantly increased coancestry relative to commercial populations, suggesting increased relatedness. Interestingly, commercially sourced seed appeared to maintain an increased number of rare alleles relative to and wild contemporary seed sources. However, while commercial seed populations were not genetically depauperate, the genomic distance between wild and commercially produced seed suggests differentiation in the genomic composition could impact restoration success. Our results point toward the importance of genetic monitoring of seed sources used for conservation and restoration as they are expected to be influenced by the evolutionary processes that contribute to divergence during the restoration process.
全球范围内受到威胁的生态系统往往依赖于种子材料的收集、繁殖和储存,以用于恢复工作。然而,在恢复过程中,种群动态变化、种群瓶颈和选择可能会改变种子材料的遗传组成,从而对恢复成功产生潜在影响。利用理论和实验框架已经证明了与这些过程相关的进化结果,但迄今为止,尚无研究考察它们对为保护和恢复而保存的种子材料的影响。在本研究中,我们比较了北美草原恢复工作的关键组成部分——多年生草原植物用于保护和恢复的不同种子来源的基因组变异。我们比较了来自当代野生种群、保护收集品、商业生产的恢复材料以及两个因农艺性状而选择的种群的个体。总体而言,我们观察到[物种名称]和当代野生种群表现出相似的基因组组成,而五个商业种群中的四个以及选定的品系彼此之间以及与其他种子来源种群存在差异。种子来源之间的基因组差异不能仅用距离隔离或定向选择来解释。我们确实发现了[物种名称]收集品的抽样效应证据,相对于商业种群,其共祖系数显著增加,表明亲缘关系增加。有趣的是,相对于[物种名称]和当代野生种子来源,商业来源的种子似乎保留了更多数量的稀有等位基因。然而,虽然商业种子种群在遗传上并非贫乏,但野生种子和商业生产种子之间的基因组距离表明,基因组组成的差异可能会影响恢复成功。我们的结果表明,对用于保护和恢复的种子来源进行遗传监测非常重要,因为它们预计会受到在恢复过程中导致分化的进化过程的影响。