克氏针与螺钉固定用于舟骨骨折的1,2骨间上支持带动脉蒂带血管骨移植的比较

Comparison of Kirschner Wire Versus Screw Fixation in 1,2 Inter-Compartment Supra Retinaculum Artery Pedicle-Vascularized Bone Graft for Scaphoid Fractures.

作者信息

Muhammad Ali Asma, Adil Muhammad, Beg Mirza Shehab A, Ahmed Osama T

机构信息

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Aug 29;13(8):e17533. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17533. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of the study was to compare the outcomes of the Kirschner wires (k-wires) versus screw fixation in 1,2 inter-compartment supra retinaculum artery (ICSRA) pedicle-vascularized bone graft for scaphoid non-union treatment.

METHOD

A retrospective study that included all patients with scaphoid nonunion underwent pedicle-vascularized bone graft and fixated with either k-wire or screw from 2010 through 2019 in the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College. Clinical outcomes were compared between k-wire and screw fixation, which were measured in terms of union rate, time of healing, pre and post-operative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, range of motion at wrist, and grip strength of hand.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were included in the study. All of them had scaphoid non-union and were treated with 1,2 ICSRA pedicle-vascularized bone graft; 20 patients had a fixation with k-wire and 13 with a screw. Radiological healing was achieved in 18 patients with k-wire and 11 patients with screw fixation, with healing rates of 90% and 84.6%, respectively. There was a significant decrease in DASH score postoperatively in both groups. Although no significant difference between the outcomes of both groups whether on union rate, DASH score, or range of motion at the wrist.

CONCLUSION

Hence, there is no significant difference in outcome between k-wire and screw fixation methods. We concluded k-wire as a more acceptable option with vascularized bone graft fixation as less technically demanding and low cost as compared to screw fixation.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是比较克氏针(k 线)与螺钉固定在 1,2 间室上支持带动脉(ICSRA)带蒂血管化骨移植治疗舟骨不愈合中的效果。

方法

一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2010 年至 2019 年在利亚卡特国家医院和医学院整形与重建外科接受带蒂血管化骨移植并用克氏针或螺钉固定的所有舟骨不愈合患者。比较了克氏针和螺钉固定的临床效果,通过骨愈合率、愈合时间、术前和术后手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍(DASH)评分、腕关节活动范围和握力来衡量。

结果

本研究共纳入 33 例患者。他们均患有舟骨不愈合,并接受了 1,2 ICSRA 带蒂血管化骨移植治疗;20 例患者用克氏针固定,13 例用螺钉固定。克氏针固定组 18 例患者和螺钉固定组 11 例患者实现了放射学愈合,愈合率分别为 90%和 84.6%。两组术后 DASH 评分均显著降低。尽管两组在骨愈合率、DASH 评分或腕关节活动范围方面的结果无显著差异。

结论

因此,克氏针和螺钉固定方法在效果上无显著差异。我们得出结论,与螺钉固定相比,克氏针作为带血管化骨移植固定的一种更可接受的选择,技术要求较低且成本较低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e790/8477263/a57bae7922ae/cureus-0013-00000017533-i01.jpg

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索