Bining Mira, Wasserman Sydney, Brahim Lydia Ould, Belzile Eric, Magalhaes Mona, Lambert Sylvie D
Ingram School of Nursing (M.B., S.W., L.O.B., S.D.L.), McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Ingram School of Nursing (M.B., S.W., L.O.B., S.D.L.), McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022 Mar;63(3):430-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
With advancements in mobile technology and increased access to smartphones, the use of Mobile Health applications (apps) has surged. These apps provide an innovative avenue for supporting cancer caregivers who face increasing burden and lack formal support; however, the quality of these apps has not been formally evaluated.
Evaluate the quality, usefulness, therapeutic potential, and security of publicly available apps to support unpaid cancer caregivers in managing their roles and responsibilities.
Cancer caregiving apps were identified through a search of the Apple and Google Play stores in October 2020. Two authors evaluated the apps using 1) the Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) tool for quality, 2) complementary sections of Enlight for therapeutic persuasiveness and alliance, security and privacy, and 3) an unmet needs checklist to assess usefulness. Analyses were undertaken to identify high-scoring apps.
Overall, 24 apps were evaluated by two authors (MB, SW). Across the sample, the mean quality score (MARS) was adequate at 65.7% (3.3/5.0, SD = .5, range: 2.3-4.2). The combined score for therapeutic persuasiveness and alliance (Enlight) was fair at 60.7% (3.0/5.0, SD = .8, range: 1.1-4.5), and the privacy and security checklists yielded means of 79.3% (6.3/8.0, SD = 1.4, range: 50.0%-100.0%) and 41.3% (1.7/4.0, SD = 1.4, range: 0.0-100.0%), respectively. The unmet needs checklist was 43.2% (SD = 5.3, range: 9.4%-69.7%). A hierarchical cluster analysis identified 12 high scoring apps.
Superior cluster apps scored acceptably for quality and privacy and low for security and usefulness. Findings will assist clinicians, caregivers, and families identify apps to support cancer caregivers.
随着移动技术的进步以及智能手机的普及,移动健康应用程序(应用)的使用量激增。这些应用为支持面临日益加重负担且缺乏正式支持的癌症护理者提供了一条创新途径;然而,这些应用的质量尚未得到正式评估。
评估公开可用的应用在支持无偿癌症护理者履行其角色和职责方面的质量、实用性、治疗潜力和安全性。
2020年10月通过搜索苹果应用商店和谷歌Play商店来识别癌症护理应用。两位作者使用以下方法评估这些应用:1)使用移动应用评分量表(MARS)工具评估质量;2)使用Enlight的补充部分评估治疗说服力、联盟、安全性和隐私;3)使用未满足需求清单评估实用性。进行分析以确定高分应用。
总体而言,两位作者(MB,SW)评估了24个应用。在整个样本中,平均质量得分(MARS)为65.7%(3.3/5.0,标准差=0.5,范围:2.3 - 4.2),处于中等水平。治疗说服力和联盟的综合得分(Enlight)为60.7%(3.0/5.0,标准差=0.8,范围:1.1 - 4.5),处于中等水平,隐私和安全清单的平均得分分别为79.3%(6.3/8.0,标准差=1.4,范围:50.0% - 100.0%)和41.3%(1.7/4.0,标准差=1.4,范围:0.0 - 100.0%)。未满足需求清单得分为43.2%(标准差=5.3,范围:9.4% - 69.7%)。层次聚类分析确定了12个高分应用。
优秀的聚类应用在质量和隐私方面得分尚可,但在安全性和实用性方面得分较低。研究结果将帮助临床医生、护理者和家庭识别支持癌症护理者的应用。