Sanchez Novas D, Fernández M S, García Guzzo M E, Aguilar Avila L T, Domenech G, Bolla F E, Terrasa S A, García Fornari G, Teijido C A
Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J Hosp Infect. 2022 Jan;119:155-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2021.09.017. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
Healthcare personnel are often at high risk of contamination when participating in airway management and other aerosol-generating procedures.
To explore the differences in self-contamination after removal of gown and coverall personal protective equipment (PPE) using an ultraviolet-fluorescent solution.
This prospective, randomized, controlled crossover trial was set in a third-level university health centre in Buenos Aires, Argentina between August and October 2020. The study included 60 anaesthesia personnel volunteers, and no participants were excluded from the study. A two-period/two-intervention design was chosen; each intervention comprised audio-guided placement of PPE, full-body spraying of fluorescent solution, audio-guided removal of PPE, and self-contamination assessment through ultraviolet light scanning. The primary outcome was the mean within-participant difference (any traces) between PPE suits. Statistical significance was tested using t-tests for paired data. The allocation ratio was 25/35 (gown followed by coverall/coverall followed by gown).
Self-contamination after removal of coveralls was greater than that after removal of gowns, with a mean within-participant difference of 11.45 traces (95% confidence interval 8.26-14.635; P<0.001). Significant differences were found for the number of self-contaminated body zones, small fluorescent traces and large fluorescent traces. Removal of a gown was associated with a markedly lower risk of self-contamination.
Quick one-step removal of a gown and gloves may reduce self-contamination in the arm/hand area. Fluorescent solutions can help to identify self-contamination and compare outcomes between available PPE suits. Repeated training sessions and enhanced knowledge on self-contamination following removal of PPE are paramount.
NCT04763304 (on ClinicalTrials.gov).
医护人员在参与气道管理和其他产生气溶胶的操作时,常常面临较高的污染风险。
使用紫外线荧光溶液探索在脱去隔离衣和连身工作服个人防护装备(PPE)后自我污染情况的差异。
这项前瞻性、随机、对照交叉试验于2020年8月至10月在阿根廷布宜诺斯艾利斯的一家三级大学健康中心进行。该研究纳入了60名麻醉科人员志愿者,没有参与者被排除在研究之外。采用两阶段/两种干预设计;每次干预包括音频引导穿戴PPE、全身喷洒荧光溶液、音频引导脱去PPE以及通过紫外线扫描进行自我污染评估。主要结局是参与者在PPE套装之间的平均内部差异(任何痕迹)。使用配对数据的t检验来检验统计学显著性。分配比例为25/35(先穿隔离衣后穿连身工作服/先穿连身工作服后穿隔离衣)。
脱去连身工作服后的自我污染程度大于脱去隔离衣后的自我污染程度,参与者内部平均差异为11.45条痕迹(95%置信区间8.26 - 14.635;P<0.001)。在自我污染的身体区域数量、小荧光痕迹和大荧光痕迹方面发现了显著差异。脱去隔离衣与明显更低的自我污染风险相关。
快速一步脱去隔离衣和手套可能会减少手臂/手部区域的自我污染。荧光溶液有助于识别自我污染并比较现有PPE套装之间的结果。反复进行培训以及增强对脱去PPE后自我污染的认识至关重要。
NCT04763304(在ClinicalTrials.gov上)