Suppr超能文献

替扎尼定治疗骨关节炎的相对疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Relative Efficacy and Safety of Tanezumab for Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized-Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Second Affiliated Hospital.

Graduate School, Dalian Medical University.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):914-924. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000986.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tanezumab for the treatment of patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 2020. Randomized-controlled trials comparing tanezumab with placebo or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with OA. Two investigators identified studies and independently extracted data, and conventional meta-analyses were conducted with Review Manager 5.3. The outcomes were pain relief, functional improvement, and risk of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 8 articles, comprising 9 randomized-controlled trials, were included. Overall, tanezumab was superior to placebo for relieving pain and improving function, as well as in the patient's global assessment. Tanezumab also had significant advantages over nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for relieving pain and improving function, as well as in the patient's global assessment. Significantly more patients discontinued treatment because of AEs after treatment with tanezumab. However, the differences in serious AEs and total joint replacement were not significant. Moreover, tanezumab-treated patients experienced significantly more rapid progression of osteoarthritis.

DISCUSSION

Tanezumab can alleviate pain and improve function for patients with OA of the hip or knee. Although tanezumab does not cause serious AEs, rapid progression of OA occurred in a small number of participants, so more clinical trials are needed to explore its safety.

摘要

目的

本荟萃分析旨在评估坦昔珠单抗治疗膝或髋关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的疗效和安全性。

方法

从建库到 2020 年 7 月,检索了 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库和 Web of Science。纳入比较坦昔珠单抗与安慰剂或非甾体抗炎药治疗 OA 患者的随机对照试验。两名研究者确定研究并独立提取数据,使用 Review Manager 5.3 进行常规荟萃分析。结局指标为疼痛缓解、功能改善和不良事件(AE)风险。

结果

共纳入 8 篇文章,包含 9 项随机对照试验。总体而言,坦昔珠单抗在缓解疼痛、改善功能以及患者整体评估方面均优于安慰剂。坦昔珠单抗在缓解疼痛、改善功能以及患者整体评估方面也显著优于非甾体抗炎药。坦昔珠单抗治疗组因 AE 而停药的患者明显更多。但是,严重 AE 和全关节置换的差异无统计学意义。此外,坦昔珠单抗治疗组患者的骨关节炎进展明显更快。

讨论

坦昔珠单抗可缓解髋或膝关节 OA 患者的疼痛并改善功能。虽然坦昔珠单抗不会引起严重 AE,但少数参与者出现了骨关节炎快速进展,因此需要更多的临床试验来探索其安全性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9aa8/8579990/3d2a6574b4ee/ajp-37-914-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验