Department of Medical Psychology and Psychiatry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
School of Medical Sciences, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil.
Med Teach. 2022 Feb;44(2):187-195. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1973979. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
The COVID-19 pandemic has seen a major disruption to undergraduate and postgraduate clinical medical education. The aim of this rapid review was to identify and synthesize published literature relating to the solutions, enablers and barriers to online learning implemented in clinical medical education during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.
All articles published before March 2021 in peer-reviewed journals, including MedEdPublish, that described authors' experience of online learning in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. A descriptive analysis of the solutions and a qualitative template analysis of enablers and barriers.
87 articles were identified for inclusion. Face to face teaching was maintained with interactive approaches between learners and/or learners and teachers. Several innovative solutions were identified. The enablers were a readiness and rapid response by institutions, with innovation by teachers. The barriers were the lack of planning and resources, usability problems and limited interactivity between teachers and students.
Important and timely evidence was obtained that can inform future policy, practice and research. The findings highlighted the urgent need to use rapid design and implementation methods with greater explicit descriptions in published articles to ensure applicability to other contexts.
COVID-19 大流行对本科和研究生临床医学教育造成了重大干扰。本快速综述的目的是确定并综合已发表的文献,这些文献涉及 COVID-19 大流行第一年期间在临床医学教育中实施的在线学习的解决方案、促成因素和障碍。
在 2021 年 3 月之前,在同行评议期刊上发表的所有文章,包括 MedEdPublish,都描述了作者针对 COVID-19 大流行实施在线学习的经验。对解决方案进行描述性分析,并对促成因素和障碍进行定性模板分析。
确定了 87 篇文章供纳入。通过学习者之间和/或学习者与教师之间的互动方法,保持了面对面教学。确定了一些创新的解决方案。促成因素是机构的准备就绪和快速反应,以及教师的创新。障碍是缺乏规划和资源、可用性问题以及教师和学生之间的互动有限。
获得了重要且及时的证据,可以为未来的政策、实践和研究提供信息。研究结果强调迫切需要使用快速设计和实施方法,并在已发表的文章中更明确地描述,以确保在其他情况下的适用性。