Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Suite 130, Toronto, ON, M5T 1P8, Canada.
Trauma, Emergency and Critical Care, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada.
Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1295-1302. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06475-2. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
Oral chlorhexidine is used widely for mechanically ventilated patients to prevent pneumonia, but recent studies show an association with excess mortality. We examined whether de-adoption of chlorhexidine and parallel implementation of a standardized oral care bundle reduces intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in mechanically ventilated patients.
A stepped wedge cluster-randomized controlled trial with concurrent process evaluation in 6 ICUs in Toronto, Canada. Clusters were randomized to de-adopt chlorhexidine and implement a standardized oral care bundle at 2-month intervals. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Secondary outcomes were time to infection-related ventilator-associated complications (IVACs), oral procedural pain and oral health dysfunction. An exploratory post hoc analysis examined time to extubation in survivors.
A total of 3260 patients were enrolled; 1560 control, 1700 intervention. ICU mortality for the intervention and control periods were 399 (23.5%) and 330 (21.2%), respectively (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.54; P = 0.46). Time to IVACs (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.06; 95% CI 0.44 to 2.57; P = 0.90), time to extubation (aHR 1.03; 95% CI 0.85 to 1.23; P = 0.79) (survivors) and oral procedural pain (aOR, 0.62; 95% CI 0.34 to 1.10; P = 0.10) were similar between control and intervention periods. However, oral health dysfunction scores (- 0.96; 95% CI - 1.75 to - 0.17; P = 0.02) improved in the intervention period.
Among mechanically ventilated ICU patients, no benefit was observed for de-adoption of chlorhexidine and implementation of an oral care bundle on ICU mortality, IVACs, oral procedural pain, or time to extubation. The intervention may improve oral health.
口腔氯己定被广泛用于机械通气患者以预防肺炎,但最近的研究表明其与死亡率增加有关。我们研究了停用氯己定并同时实施标准化口腔护理包是否可以降低机械通气患者的重症监护病房(ICU)死亡率。
在加拿大多伦多的 6 个 ICU 中进行了一项阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验,并同时进行了过程评估。以 2 个月为间隔对集群进行随机分组,以停用氯己定并实施标准化口腔护理包。主要结局是 ICU 死亡率。次要结局是感染相关呼吸机相关性并发症(IVAC)、口腔操作疼痛和口腔健康功能障碍的发生时间。一项探索性事后分析检查了幸存者拔管时间。
共纳入 3260 例患者;对照组 1560 例,干预组 1700 例。干预组和对照组的 ICU 死亡率分别为 399(23.5%)和 330(21.2%)(调整后的优势比[aOR],1.13;95%置信区间[CI],0.82 至 1.54;P=0.46)。IVAC 发生时间(调整后的危害比[aHR],1.06;95%CI,0.44 至 2.57;P=0.90)、拔管时间(aHR,1.03;95%CI,0.85 至 1.23;P=0.79)(幸存者)和口腔操作疼痛(aOR,0.62;95%CI,0.34 至 1.10;P=0.10)在对照组和干预组之间相似。然而,干预组的口腔健康功能评分(-0.96;95%CI,-1.75 至-0.17;P=0.02)有所改善。
在机械通气的 ICU 患者中,停用氯己定和实施口腔护理包对 ICU 死亡率、IVAC、口腔操作疼痛或拔管时间没有益处。该干预措施可能会改善口腔健康。