• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

O-SEA方法:一种应对全国性并发创伤以增强地方影响力的模式。

The O-SEA approach: A model to increase local impact in response to national co-occurring trauma.

作者信息

Hickson Joniesha M, Paul Roddia J, Smedley Jessica M, Kozne Jeremy, Alesi Francesca, Weber Holly

机构信息

Department of Clinical Psychology, Chicago School of Professional Psychology.

D.C. Psychological Association.

出版信息

Psychol Trauma. 2023 Feb;15(2):295-303. doi: 10.1037/tra0001153. Epub 2021 Oct 7.

DOI:10.1037/tra0001153
PMID:34618484
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The presence of the COVID-19 and racism pandemics underscored the need for a basic model of advocacy for psychologists and budding psychologists. We offer a new model of action to be easily replicated, particularly during times of crisis, with aims to impact change locally and beyond the therapeutic space.

METHOD

The D.C. Psychological Association (DCPA) actively responded to the double pandemics of COVID-19. Using a posthoc qualitative analysis four steps were identified: organizing, providing support and education, and engaging in advocacy (O-SEA Approach), which all centered the specific skill set of psychologists and psychologists-in-training.

RESULTS

Measures of success included the following: increased membership and engagement of members, development of relevant programming to providers and the community, community attendance of events, statements indicating knowledge gained by providers, new connections with local organizations and officials, and local legislative change.

CONCLUSIONS

The O-SEA Approach provides a framework for local advocacy that can empower psychologists to contribute their expertise in tangible and impactful ways. This model seeks justice for all people through elevating the voices of the unjustly marginalized, providing support and education to mental health providers and the community, and advocating for policy that is grounded in culturally relevant research. The O-SEA Approach can be successful in these aspirations and be applied in communities across the nation. Clinical Impact Statement: The permanence of racism in the United States is evident throughout history when examining America's social, economic, and political systems. Racism's reverberations are present locally, in the nation's capital, through its policing techniques and gentrification, among other insidious manifestations. COVID-19's global impact has been reported to have particularly deleterious effects on Black, Indigenous and People of Color (BIPOC) through impacting housing, food, and income security while simultaneously underscoring the lack of access to health resources. This demanded a response by mental health professionals. Consequently, the D.C. Psychological Association made efforts to organize, support, educate, and advocate for the local community through what is called the O-SEA Approach. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

目的

新冠疫情和种族主义大流行凸显了为心理学家和初出茅庐的心理学家建立一个基本倡导模式的必要性。我们提供了一种易于复制的新行动模式,特别是在危机时期,旨在在当地及治疗空间之外产生变革性影响。

方法

华盛顿特区心理协会(DCPA)积极应对新冠疫情。通过事后定性分析确定了四个步骤:组织、提供支持和教育以及参与倡导(O-SEA方法),所有这些都以心理学家和心理学实习生的特定技能组合为核心。

结果

成功的衡量标准包括以下方面:会员人数增加和会员参与度提高、为提供者和社区制定相关计划、社区活动的参与度、表明提供者获得知识的声明、与当地组织和官员建立新联系以及当地立法变革。

结论

O-SEA方法为地方倡导提供了一个框架,使心理学家能够以切实且有影响力的方式贡献他们的专业知识。该模式通过提升被不公正边缘化群体的声音、为心理健康提供者和社区提供支持和教育以及倡导基于文化相关研究的政策,为所有人寻求正义。O-SEA方法可以在这些目标上取得成功,并应用于全国的社区。临床影响声明:审视美国的社会、经济和政治制度时,种族主义在美国历史上的持久性显而易见。种族主义的影响在当地,即在国家首都,通过其治安手段、城市绅士化以及其他阴险的表现形式体现出来。据报道,新冠疫情的全球影响对黑人、原住民和有色人种(BIPOC)产生了特别有害的影响,影响了他们的住房、食品和收入安全,同时凸显了他们难以获得医疗资源的问题。这需要心理健康专业人员做出回应。因此,华盛顿特区心理协会通过所谓的O-SEA方法,努力为当地社区组织、提供支持、开展教育并进行倡导。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

1
The O-SEA approach: A model to increase local impact in response to national co-occurring trauma.O-SEA方法:一种应对全国性并发创伤以增强地方影响力的模式。
Psychol Trauma. 2023 Feb;15(2):295-303. doi: 10.1037/tra0001153. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
2
A model of collaborative immigration advocacy to prevent policy-based trauma and harm.合作推动移民权益倡导模式,以预防基于政策的创伤和伤害。
Psychol Trauma. 2024 Aug;16(Suppl 2):S435-S445. doi: 10.1037/tra0001330. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Lessons Learned About Trauma Related to Racial Discrimination During COVID-19 in the United States.美国在 COVID-19 期间从种族歧视相关创伤中吸取的教训。
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1457:343-361. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-61939-7_19.
5
From the medical model to the recovery model: Psychologists engaging in advocacy and social justice action agendas in public mental health.从医学模式到恢复模式:心理学家在公共心理健康领域参与倡导和社会正义行动议程。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2023;93(2):120-130. doi: 10.1037/ort0000656. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
6
Coping in crisis: The role of psychologists in response to a pandemic.应对危机:心理学家在应对大流行病中的作用。
Psychol Serv. 2022;19(Suppl 2):28-32. doi: 10.1037/ser0000527. Epub 2021 May 24.
7
Addressing health inequities for children in immigrant families: Psychologists as leaders and links across systems.解决移民家庭儿童的健康不平等问题:心理学家作为领导者和系统之间的联系。
Am Psychol. 2023 Feb-Mar;78(2):173-185. doi: 10.1037/amp0001016.
8
COVID-19 Interconnectedness: Health Inequity, the Climate Crisis, and Collective Trauma.COVID-19 的关联性:健康不平等、气候危机和集体创伤。
Fam Process. 2020 Sep;59(3):832-846. doi: 10.1111/famp.12572. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
9
Commentary: If not you, then who: Equity, social justice, and the role of school psychologists in ensuring reading success for all learners.评论:如果不是你,那会是谁:公平、社会正义以及学校心理学家在确保所有学习者阅读成功方面的作用。
Sch Psychol. 2023 Jan;38(1):44-47. doi: 10.1037/spq0000525. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
10
Defining racial allies: A qualitative investigation of White allyship from the perspective of people of color.界定种族盟友:从有色人种视角对白人盟友关系的质性研究。
J Couns Psychol. 2023 Nov;70(6):631-644. doi: 10.1037/cou0000709.