Suppr超能文献

心理一致感与牙科恐惧/牙科焦虑:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Sense of coherence and dental fear/dental anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Child and Adolescent Oral Health, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Department of Dentistry, Centro Universitário Newton Paiva, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

出版信息

Spec Care Dentist. 2022 May;42(3):257-265. doi: 10.1111/scd.12663. Epub 2021 Oct 10.

Abstract

AIM

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the association between sense of coherence (SOC) and dental fear/dental anxiety.

METHODS

Computerized searches were performed in six databases. Gray literature and manual searches were also conducted. Study selection, risk of bias assessment, and meta-analyses were performed. The results of meta-analyses were reported in odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), and confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

After removing duplicates, 131 references were retrieved and the full texts of 12 were evaluated. Nine references met the eligibility criteria and were included. The results of meta-analyses demonstrated that individuals with a weaker SOC had a score in the dental anxiety/dental fear scale 6.04 times higher than individuals with a stronger SOC (OR = 6.04, CI = 2.62-13.91). Individuals with no dental anxiety/dental fear had a mean score of the SOC scale higher than individuals with dental anxiety/dental fear (MD = 5.39, CI = 2.21-8.56). Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the result of a higher mean score of the SOC scale among individuals with no dental anxiety/dental fear remained (MD = 7.38, CI = 3.79-10.98). Risk of bias ranged from low to high. The certainty of evidence was very low.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with stronger SOC have lower levels of dental fear/dental anxiety.

摘要

目的

本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估综合感知(SOC)与牙齿恐惧/牙齿焦虑之间的关联。

方法

在六个数据库中进行计算机检索。还进行了灰色文献和手动搜索。进行了研究选择、偏倚风险评估和荟萃分析。荟萃分析的结果以比值比(OR)、均数差(MD)和置信区间(CI)报告。

结果

去除重复项后,共检索到 131 篇参考文献,评估了 12 篇全文。符合入选标准的有 9 篇参考文献,并被纳入。荟萃分析的结果表明,SOC 较弱的个体在牙齿焦虑/恐惧量表上的得分比 SOC 较强的个体高 6.04 倍(OR=6.04,CI=2.62-13.91)。无牙齿焦虑/恐惧的个体 SOC 量表的平均得分高于有牙齿焦虑/恐惧的个体(MD=5.39,CI=2.21-8.56)。敏感性分析表明,无牙齿焦虑/恐惧个体 SOC 量表的平均得分较高的结果仍然存在(MD=7.38,CI=3.79-10.98)。偏倚风险从低到高不等。证据的确定性非常低。

结论

SOC 较强的个体牙齿恐惧/焦虑水平较低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验