Department of Health Services Management & Policy, College of Public Health, Center for Applied Research & Evaluation in Women's Health, East Tennessee State University, PO Box 70264, Johnson, TN, 37614, USA.
Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, The University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, 1665 University Blvd, RPHB 330F, Birmingham, AL, 35294, USA.
Matern Child Health J. 2021 Dec;25(12):1960-1971. doi: 10.1007/s10995-021-03260-x. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
State medicaid programs provide access to effective contraception for people with lower incomes. This study examined contraception use and pregnancy among reproductive-age women enrolled in the South Carolina Medicaid, by eligibility program and socio-demographic sub-groups.
A retrospective cohort of women aged 15-45 who were newly eligible for South Carolina Medicaid from 2012 to 2016 was examined. Log-binomial regression and average marginal effects assessed relationships between contraception use and pregnancies ending in live and non-live births. Contraception was categorized as permanent, long acting reversible contraception (LARC), short-acting hormonal contraception (SAC), or no contraceptive claims. Women with family planning or full-benefit medicaid coverage were included.
Approximately 11% of women used LARC methods, 41% used SAC methods, and 46% had no evidence of contraceptive claims. Method utilization varied by eligibility program, race/ethnicity and age. The likelihood of pregnancy was lower among SAC users and lowest among LARC users compared to women with no evidence of contraception across all three programs (family planning APR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.41-0.49 and APR = 0.13, 95% CI 0.10-0.17; Low income families APR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.77-0.88 and APR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.28-0.38; Partners for Healthy Children APR = 0.72; 95% CI 0.68-0.77 and APR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.30-0.43, respectively). Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic teens were less likely to experience a pregnancy than non-Hispanic white teens.
The likelihood of pregnancy was lower among women using SAC methods and markedly lower among women using LARC. Variation in contraceptive use among racial/ethnic groups was noted despite Medicaid coverage. As new policies and initiatives emerge, these findings provide important context for understanding the role of Medicaid programs in reducing financial barriers to contraceptive services and ensuring access to effective contraception, while fostering reproductive health autonomy among women.
州医疗补助计划为低收入人群提供有效的避孕措施。本研究通过资格项目和社会人口亚组,检查了南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划中育龄妇女的避孕措施使用情况和妊娠情况。
对 2012 年至 2016 年期间新符合南卡罗来纳州医疗补助计划条件的 15-45 岁妇女进行了回顾性队列研究。采用对数二项式回归和平均边际效应评估了避孕措施使用与活产和非活产妊娠结局之间的关系。避孕措施分为永久性、长效可逆避孕(LARC)、短期激素避孕(SAC)和无避孕措施。包括有计划生育或全额福利的医疗补助计划覆盖的妇女。
约 11%的妇女使用 LARC 方法,41%的妇女使用 SAC 方法,46%的妇女没有避孕措施的证据。不同资格项目、种族/民族和年龄的方法使用率不同。与所有三个项目中无避孕措施的妇女相比,SAC 使用者和 LARC 使用者怀孕的可能性较低(计划生育 APR=0.44;95%CI 0.41-0.49 和 APR=0.13,95%CI 0.10-0.17;低收入家庭 APR=0.82;95%CI 0.77-0.88 和 APR=0.33,95%CI 0.28-0.38;伙伴健康儿童 APR=0.72;95%CI 0.68-0.77 和 APR=0.35,95%CI 0.30-0.43)。非西班牙裔黑人青少年和西班牙裔青少年怀孕的可能性低于非西班牙裔白人青少年。
SAC 方法使用者怀孕的可能性较低,而 LARC 方法使用者怀孕的可能性显著降低。尽管有医疗补助计划覆盖,但不同种族/族裔群体的避孕措施使用情况存在差异。随着新政策和倡议的出现,这些发现为了解医疗补助计划在减少避孕服务的经济障碍和确保有效避孕措施的获得方面的作用,以及促进妇女的生殖健康自主权提供了重要背景。