Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences and Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences and Gerontology Research Center, University of Jyvaskyla, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2022 Jan-Feb;98:104522. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2021.104522. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
Meaningful activities can be done in or around home, but opportunities for participation and active aging decrease when moving in smaller areas. Active aging refers to having an active approach to life in line with one's goals, ability and opportunities. In adults over 75 years with different baseline neighborhood mobility levels, we studied active aging scores two years prior to and amid COVID-19, when governments restricted mobility of residents to slow the COVID-19 outbreak.
AGNES cohort data were collected in 2017-2018 and spring 2020. Individuals were queried about their will, ability, and opportunity, and extent of doing 17 activities, and subsequently, item, composite and sub-scores of active aging were computed. Neighborhood mobility was assessed as frequency of moving in or beyond own neighborhood (limited, regular, daily=reference). Associations were studied using Generalized Linear Models (cross-sectionally, n = 1007) and General Estimating Equations (prospectively, n = 774).
Participants with limited baseline neighborhood mobility had lower active aging scores than those with daily mobility, but the decline over time was similar. Some item scores on opportunity to act and extent of doing, e.g. for making one's day more interesting and advancing matters of faith or worldview, were better retained amid COVID-19 by those with limited mobility, attenuating group differences.
Active aging scores were somewhat compromised in individuals with limited neighborhood mobility, but opportunities for and engagement in several activities seemed to be better retained amid COVID-19 than for those with daily mobility. Thus, active aging may be possible despite mobility restriction.
人们可以在家里或周围进行有意义的活动,但当活动范围变小时,参与和积极老龄化的机会就会减少。积极老龄化是指采取积极的生活方式,符合个人的目标、能力和机会。在不同基线邻里流动性水平的 75 岁以上成年人中,我们研究了积极老龄化评分,这些评分是在 COVID-19 之前和期间进行的,当时政府限制居民的流动性以减缓 COVID-19 的爆发。
AGNES 队列数据于 2017-2018 年和 2020 年春季收集。个体被询问他们的意愿、能力和机会,以及完成 17 项活动的程度,随后计算出积极老龄化的项目、综合和子评分。邻里流动性被评估为在或超出自己的邻里范围内移动的频率(受限、常规、日常=参考)。使用广义线性模型(横截面,n=1007)和广义估计方程(前瞻性,n=774)研究了关联。
基线邻里流动性受限的参与者的积极老龄化评分低于日常流动性的参与者,但随时间的推移,下降幅度相似。一些关于行动机会和活动程度的项目评分,例如使自己的一天更有趣和推进信仰或世界观的事务,在 COVID-19 期间,流动性受限的个体保留得更好,减弱了组间差异。
在邻里流动性受限的个体中,积极老龄化评分有些受损,但在 COVID-19 期间,一些活动的机会和参与似乎比日常流动性的个体更好地保留。因此,尽管受到流动性限制,但积极老龄化可能是可行的。