Suppr超能文献

血管加压素控制子宫切除术期间的失血:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Vasopressin to Control Blood Loss during Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah (Drs. Hafidh, Latifah, Gari, and Baradwan).

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center, Jeddah (Drs. Hafidh, Latifah, Gari, and Baradwan); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah (Dr. Gari).

出版信息

J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022 Mar;29(3):355-364.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Minimizing intraoperative blood loss during hysterectomy is crucial to lessen associated perioperative morbidity. The aim of this investigation is to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared vasopressin versus normal saline in controlling intraoperative blood loss during hysterectomy.

DATA SOURCES

We screened 5 major databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from inception till July 18, 2021. We used the following query search in all databases: (vasopressin OR arginine vasopressin OR argipressin OR antidiuretic hormone) AND (hysterectomy) AND (saline OR placebo OR control OR no treatment) AND (randomized OR randomised OR randomly). There was no language restriction during database screening.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We considered all studies that met the following evidence-based criteria: (1) patients: individuals undergoing hysterectomy for any indication, (2) intervention: vasopressin, (3) comparator: normal saline, placebo, or no treatment, (4) outcomes: reliable extraction of any of our endpoints, and (5) study design: RCTs. We assessed risk of bias of included studies and pooled endpoints as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). We performed statistical analysis using the Review Manager software, version 5.4.0.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Seven RCTs with an overall low risk of bias met the inclusion criteria. This meta-analysis included a total of 455 patients; 232 and 223 patients were allocated to vasopressin and control group, respectively. The majority of RCTs were vaginal hysterectomy (n = 5), few abdominal hysterectomy, (n = 2) and no laparoscopic hysterectomy. The mean estimated intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in favor of the vasopressin group compared with the control group (n = 6 RCTs, MD = -119.85 mL, 95% CI [-177.55, -62.14], p <.001). However, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding mean operating time, mean change in postoperative hemoglobin, mean hospital stay, rate of febrile morbidity, rate of pelvic infection, rate of perioperative blood transfusion, and rate of perioperative complications.

CONCLUSION

Compared with normal saline, vasopressin significantly reduced the estimated blood loss during hysterectomy but did not change any clinically significant outcomes. In addition, vasopressin was safe and did not correlate with an increase in the rates of febrile morbidity or pelvic infection.

摘要

目的

减少子宫切除术过程中的术中失血量对于降低相关围手术期发病率至关重要。本研究旨在对所有比较加压素与生理盐水在控制子宫切除术中术中失血量的随机对照试验(RCT)进行系统评价和荟萃分析。

数据来源

我们从成立到 2021 年 7 月 18 日筛选了 5 个主要数据库(PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册)。我们在所有数据库中使用了以下查询搜索:(加压素或精氨酸加压素或 argipressin 或抗利尿激素)和(子宫切除术)和(盐水或安慰剂或对照或无治疗)和(随机或随机或随机)。在数据库筛选过程中没有语言限制。

研究选择方法

我们考虑了符合以下循证标准的所有研究:(1)患者:因任何原因接受子宫切除术的个体,(2)干预:加压素,(3)比较:生理盐水、安慰剂或无治疗,(4)结局:可靠提取我们任何终点的结果,(5)研究设计:RCT。我们评估了纳入研究的偏倚风险,并将终点作为均数差(MD)或风险比(RR)与 95%置信区间(CI)进行汇总。我们使用 Review Manager 软件,版本 5.4.0 进行统计分析。

列表、整合和结果:符合纳入标准的共有 7 项低偏倚风险 RCT。这项荟萃分析共纳入 455 名患者;加压素组和对照组分别有 232 名和 223 名患者。大多数 RCT 为阴道子宫切除术(n=5),少数为腹式子宫切除术(n=2),无腹腔镜子宫切除术。与对照组相比,加压素组的术中估计出血量明显减少(n=6 RCT,MD=-119.85 mL,95%CI[-177.55,-62.14],p<0.001)。然而,两组间的平均手术时间、术后血红蛋白平均变化、平均住院时间、发热发病率、盆腔感染率、围手术期输血率和围手术期并发症率无显著差异。

结论

与生理盐水相比,加压素可显著减少子宫切除术过程中的估计出血量,但不会改变任何有临床意义的结果。此外,加压素是安全的,与发热发病率或盆腔感染率的增加无关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验