Key Laboratory for Fungal Diversity and Green Development, The Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming, Kunming Institute Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingsong Road 21#, Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, China.
Department of Land, Air and Water Resources, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, 95616, USA.
Arch Microbiol. 2021 Dec;203(10):6303-6314. doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02598-8. Epub 2021 Oct 15.
Truffles contribute to crucial soil systems dynamics, being involved in plentiful ecological functions important for ecosystems. Despite this, the interactions between truffles and their surrounding mycobiome remain unknown. Here, we investigate soil mycobiome differences between two truffle species, Tuber indicum (Ti) and Tuber pseudohimalayense (Tp), and their relative influence on surrounding soil mycobiota. Using traditional chemical analysis and ITS Illumina sequencing, we compared soil nutrients and the mycobiota, respectively, in soil, gleba, and peridium of the two truffle species inhabiting the same Pinus armandii forest in southwestern China. Tp soil was more acidic (pH 6.42) and had a higher nutrient content (total C, N content) than Ti soil (pH 6.62). Fungal richness and diversity of fruiting bodies (ascomata) and surrounding soils were significantly higher in Tp than in Ti. Truffle species recruited unique soil mycobiota around their ascomata: in Ti soil, fungal taxa, including Suillus, Alternaria, Phacidium, Mycosphaerella, Halokirschsteiniothelia, and Pseudogymnoascus, were abundant, while in Tp soil species of Melanophyllum, Inocybe, Rhizopogon, Rhacidium, and Lecanicillium showed higher abundances. Three dissimilarity tests, including adonis, anosim, and MRPP, showed that differences in fungal community structure between the two truffle species and their surrounding soils were stronger in Tp than in Ti, and these differences extended to truffle tissues (peridium and gleba). Redundancy analysis (RDA) further demonstrated that correlations between soil fungal taxa and soil properties changed from negative (Tp) to positive (Ti) and shifted from a moisture-driven (Tp) to a total N-driven (Ti) relationship. Overall, our results shed light on the influence that truffles have on their surrounding soil mycobiome. However, further studies are required on a broader range of truffle species in different soil conditions in order to determine causal relationships between truffles and their soil mycobiome.
块菌促进关键土壤系统动态变化,参与许多对生态系统很重要的生态功能。尽管如此,块菌与其周围真菌区系之间的相互作用仍然未知。在这里,我们调查了两种块菌,即印度块菌(Ti)和喜马拉雅块菌(Tp),以及它们对周围土壤真菌区系的相对影响。使用传统的化学分析和 ITS Illumina 测序,我们分别比较了两种块菌在土壤、菌核和外种皮中土壤养分和真菌区系的差异,这些块菌都生长在中国西南部同一片华山松林里。Tp 土壤的 pH 值(6.42)较低,养分含量(总 C、N 含量)较高,而 Ti 土壤的 pH 值(6.62)较高。Tp 的子实体和周围土壤的真菌丰富度和多样性显著高于 Ti。块菌在其子实体周围招募了独特的土壤真菌区系:在 Ti 土壤中,包括 Suillus、Alternaria、Phacidium、Mycosphaerella、Halokirschsteiniothelia 和 Pseudogymnoascus 在内的真菌类群丰富,而在 Tp 土壤中,Melanophyllum、Inocybe、Rhizopogon、Rhacidium 和 Lecanicillium 等物种的丰度较高。三种差异测试,包括 adonis、anosim 和 MRPP,表明两种块菌及其周围土壤中真菌群落结构的差异在 Tp 中比在 Ti 中更强,并且这些差异延伸到块菌组织(外种皮和菌核)。冗余分析(RDA)进一步表明,土壤真菌类群与土壤性质之间的相关性从负相关(Tp)变为正相关(Ti),从水分驱动(Tp)转变为总 N 驱动(Ti)。总的来说,我们的研究结果揭示了块菌对其周围土壤真菌区系的影响。然而,需要在不同土壤条件下对更多种类的块菌进行更广泛的研究,以确定块菌与其土壤真菌区系之间的因果关系。