Stanford Esophageal Multidimensional Program in Innovation and Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2022 Aug 1;56(7):565-570. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001613. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
Question prompt lists (QPLs) are structured sets of disease-specific questions intended for patient use, enhancing the patient-physician communication by encouraging patients to ask relevant questions during a consultation. Recently, a preliminary 78 question gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) specific QPL was created by 12 esophageal experts through a modified Delphi (RAND/University of California, Los Angeles) technique. Patients' perspectives and opinions on each question, however, had not been accounted for in the preliminary expert' version.
The aim was to modify a preliminary experts' QPL, specific to adults with GERD, following patient perspectives and opinions.
A preliminary GERD QPL was modified through patient input and opinions. Thirty-eight patients with a clinical diagnosis of GERD followed at Stanford University Esophageal Clinic between January and November 2019 were consented to modify the preliminary 78 question expert QPL version. After receiving the QPL in Qualtrics (Provo, UT) by a direct e-mail invitation, patients independently rated questions on a 5-point Likert scale, where 1="should not be included," 2="unimportant," 3="don't know/depends," 4="important," and 5="essential." Questions were accepted for inclusion in the QPL with an a priori interagreement of 80% ranking in the range of 4 to 5. At the end, patients were encouraged to propose additional questions to incorporate into the QPL by open-endedly asking "Are there questions we didn't ask, that you think we should?"
Twenty-three patients with GERD (19 female, median age 64) fully participated and modified the existing QPL (60.5%). Of the 78 questions from the preliminary GERD QPL, 66 questions (84.6%) were accepted for inclusion. The question with the highest agreement among patients rating a question as essential consisted of "what habits, food, and drinks do I have to avoid?" (82.6%). Questions eliminated because of disagreement included "What is the natural history of GERD," "Do I have a high chance to die from my Barrett's?," and "Why are you prescribing an antidepressant to treat my GERD?" Nine patients suggested additional questions totaling to 16 separate questions, including "What type of surgeries are there to help GERD?," "What stage is my GERD?," "What are the odds/percentage of getting cancer from GERD?" Incorporating the suggested questions, the final GERD QPL-created by esophageal experts and modified by patients-consisted of 82 questions.
Esophageal experts and GERD patients have a high level of agreement on important questions, though there is some variation in perspective. Future studies can simplify this list and measure the impact of a shared GERD QPL on patients' decisional conflict and perceived involvement in care.
问题提示清单(QPLs)是一组针对特定疾病的结构化问题,旨在供患者使用,通过鼓励患者在咨询期间提出相关问题,从而增强医患沟通。最近,通过改良德尔菲法(RAND/加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校)技术,由 12 名食管专家创建了初步的 78 个胃食管反流病(GERD)特定 QPL。然而,在初步的专家版本中,并没有考虑患者对每个问题的看法和意见。
目的是根据患者的观点和意见,对成人 GERD 的初步专家 QPL 进行修改。
通过患者的投入和意见来修改初步的 GERD QPL。2019 年 1 月至 11 月期间,斯坦福大学食管诊所就诊的 38 名临床诊断为 GERD 的患者同意修改初步的 78 个专家 QPL 版本。在收到 Qualtrics(普罗沃,犹他州)通过直接电子邮件邀请的 QPL 后,患者独立对每个问题进行了 5 分制的李克特量表评分,其中 1=“不应包含”,2=“不重要”,3=“不知道/取决于”,4=“重要”,5=“必不可少”。如果预先设定的共识为 80%,问题在 4 到 5 之间,则接受包含在 QPL 中。最后,鼓励患者通过开放式问题“是否有我们没有问到的问题,您认为我们应该问?”来提出要纳入 QPL 的其他问题。
23 名 GERD 患者(19 名女性,中位年龄 64 岁)充分参与并修改了现有的 QPL(60.5%)。在初步 GERD QPL 的 78 个问题中,有 66 个问题(84.6%)被接受纳入。患者对某个问题评价为“必不可少”的评分最高的问题是“我必须避免哪些习惯、食物和饮料?”(82.6%)。由于意见不合而被淘汰的问题包括“GERD 的自然病史是什么?”、“我有很高的几率死于 Barrett's 吗?”和“为什么您要开抗抑郁药来治疗我的 GERD?”有 9 名患者提出了总计 16 个单独问题的额外问题,包括“有哪些治疗 GERD 的手术?”、“我的 GERD 处于哪个阶段?”、“患 GERD 的癌症几率是多少?”纳入建议的问题后,由食管专家创建并由患者修改的最终 GERD QPL 由 82 个问题组成。
食管专家和 GERD 患者对重要问题有很高的一致性,但观点存在一定差异。未来的研究可以简化这个清单,并衡量共同的 GERD QPL 对患者决策冲突和感知参与护理的影响。