Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore.
Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Hospital, Singapore; Cancer Science Institute of Singapore, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2021 Nov;167:103507. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103507. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
CNS prophylaxis is commonly used in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with risk features for CNS relapse. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares CNS relapse rates with and without CNS prophylaxis, for patients at intermediate to high CNS relapse risk. Studies reporting CNS relapse risk category and CNS outcomes with and without CNS prophylaxis for antiCD20-CHOP treated DLBCL patients were included. 10 studies with 3770 patients at intermediate to high CNS relapse risk were analyzed. No significant difference in the pooled Absolute Risk Difference (ARD 0.01, 95 % CI -0.01 to 0.02, P = 0.61) or Risk (RR 1.22, 95 % CI 0.81-1.83, P = 0.34) was noted in patients with and without CNS prophylaxis. There were also no differences within pre-specified subgroups of IV Methotrexate or IT chemotherapy. However, the quality of evidence supporting these observations was low. A meta-analysis of individual patient data will help evaluate the benefit of CNS prophylaxis strategies.
中枢神经系统(CNS)预防被广泛用于具有 CNS 复发风险特征的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者。本系统评价和荟萃分析比较了具有和不具有 CNS 预防的患者的 CNS 复发率,这些患者具有中等到高 CNS 复发风险。纳入了报告 CNS 复发风险类别和 CNS 结果的研究,这些研究是针对接受抗 CD20-CHOP 治疗的 DLBCL 患者,具有和不具有 CNS 预防。对 10 项具有中等到高 CNS 复发风险的 3770 例患者进行了分析。具有和不具有 CNS 预防的患者的累积绝对风险差异(ARD 0.01,95%CI -0.01 至 0.02,P = 0.61)或风险(RR 1.22,95%CI 0.81-1.83,P = 0.34)均无显著差异。在 IV 甲氨蝶呤或 IT 化疗的预先指定亚组中也没有差异。然而,支持这些观察结果的证据质量较低。对个体患者数据的荟萃分析将有助于评估 CNS 预防策略的获益。