Archer Alfred, Cawston Amanda
Department of Philosophy, Tilburg University, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Topoi (Dordr). 2022;41(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s11245-021-09763-0. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Is there good reason to worry about celebrity involvement in democratic politics? The rise of celebrity politicians such as Donald Trump and Vladimir Zelensky has led political theorists and commentators to worry that the role of expertise in democratic politics has been undermined. According to one recent critique (Archer et al. 2020), celebrities possess a significant degree of epistemic power (the power to influence what people believe) that is unconnected to appropriate expertise. This presents a problem both for deliberative and epistemic theories of democratic legitimacy, which ignore this form of power, and for real existing democracies attempting to meet the standards of legitimacy set out by these theories. But do these critiques apply to democratic elitism? In this paper, we argue that recognition of celebrity epistemic power in fact represents a valuable resource for supporting the legitimacy and practice of democratic elitism, though these benefits do come with certain risks to which elite theories are particularly vulnerable.
是否有充分的理由担忧名人涉足民主政治?唐纳德·特朗普和弗拉基米尔·泽连斯基等名人政治家的崛起,让政治理论家和评论家担心专业知识在民主政治中的作用受到了削弱。根据最近的一项批评(阿彻等人,2020年),名人拥有相当程度的认知权力(影响人们信念的权力),而这种权力与适当的专业知识并无关联。这给忽视这种权力形式的民主合法性的审议理论和认知理论带来了问题,也给试图达到这些理论所设定的合法性标准的现实存在的民主国家带来了问题。但这些批评适用于民主精英主义吗?在本文中,我们认为,承认名人的认知权力实际上是支持民主精英主义的合法性和实践的宝贵资源,尽管这些好处确实伴随着某些风险,而精英理论尤其容易受到这些风险的影响。