Velotta Jeffrey B, Dusendang Jennifer R, Kwak Hyunjee, Huyser Michelle, Patel Ashish, Ashiku Simon K, Herrinton Lisa J
Department of Thoracic Surgery, Oakland Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Sep;13(9):5477-5486. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-3220.
To improve nutritional status and dysphagia, esophageal cancer patients starting neoadjuvant therapy in advance of curative-intent surgery may receive a jejunostomy tube (J-tube) or esophageal stent, or they may be managed without a feeding modality. We examined percent total weight loss (%TWL), reinterventions, and progression to surgery in relation to these options.
The retrospective cohort study included stage II-III esophageal cancer patients diagnosed during 2010-2017 who received J-tube, stent, or nutritional counseling only, without a procedure, when starting chemotherapy or combined modality chemoradiation. Data were obtained from the electronic medical record and chart review. We compared median %TWL between intervention groups and reinterventions using Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests.
Among the 366 patients, median %TWL reached a nadir at 120 days, when it was 7% for patients with no procedure (N=307), 4% for J-tube (N=39), and 16% for stent (N=20) (P=0.01). Individual case analysis revealed 72-80% of the patients in the three groups started chemotherapy or chemoradiation as neoadjuvant curative-intent therapy (P difference =0.79). In J-tube patients, the reasons for intervention was anticipation of weight loss in 49% and mitigation of actual weight loss in 15%, whereas 95% of stent patients received the stent for dysphagia (P<0.001). A complication of the procedure was recorded in 85% of stent patients and 74% of J-tube patients (P<0.001). Among those who received no procedure initially, 25% received one later, compared with 15% of J-tube patients and 70% of stent patients who received a second procedure (P<0.001). Progression to surgery was observed in 65% of patients with no procedure, 51% of patients with J-tube, and 40% of stent patients, P=0.28).
For stage II-III esophageal cancer patients starting chemotherapy, this study gives evidence that stents were associated with significant %TWL and risk of reintervention. Although J-tube patients returned to baseline weight sooner than those with no procedure, they experienced complications from their J-tubes. For esophageal cancer patients undergoing curative-intent treatment and with acceptable levels of weight loss, no procedure at all may be superior to placing a J-tube in terms of complications, weight loss, and progression to curative-intent surgery.
为改善营养状况和吞咽困难,在进行根治性手术前开始新辅助治疗的食管癌患者可接受空肠造口管(J管)或食管支架置入,或者不采用任何喂养方式进行处理。我们研究了与这些选择相关的总体体重减轻百分比(%TWL)、再次干预以及手术进展情况。
这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2010年至2017年期间诊断为II - III期食管癌且在开始化疗或放化疗联合治疗时仅接受J管置入、支架置入或营养咨询(未进行手术)的患者。数据从电子病历和病历审查中获取。我们使用卡方检验和克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯检验比较干预组之间的中位%TWL和再次干预情况。
在366例患者中,中位%TWL在120天时达到最低点,未进行任何操作的患者(N = 307)为7%,J管置入患者(N = 39)为4%,支架置入患者(N = 20)为16%(P = 0.01)。个体病例分析显示,三组中72% - 80%的患者开始将化疗或放化疗作为新辅助根治性治疗(P差值 = 0.79)。在J管置入患者中,进行干预的原因是预计体重减轻的占49%,减轻实际体重减轻的占15%,而95%的支架置入患者因吞咽困难接受支架置入(P < 0.001)。85%的支架置入患者和74%的J管置入患者记录有操作并发症(P < 0.001)。最初未进行任何操作的患者中,25%后来接受了一次操作,相比之下,接受二次操作的J管置入患者为15%,支架置入患者为70%(P < 0.001)。65%未进行任何操作的患者、51%J管置入患者和40%支架置入患者进展至手术(P = 0.28)。
对于开始化疗的II - III期食管癌患者,本研究表明支架置入与显著的%TWL及再次干预风险相关。尽管J管置入患者比未进行任何操作的患者更快恢复至基线体重,但他们经历了J管相关并发症。对于接受根治性治疗且体重减轻处于可接受水平的食管癌患者,在并发症、体重减轻和进展至根治性手术方面,不进行任何操作可能优于置入J管。