Bautista Wendy, Adelson P David, Bicher Nathan, Themistocleous Marios, Tsivgoulis Georgios, Chang Jason J
Center for Advanced Preclinical Research (CAPR), National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Department of Child Health, Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2021 Oct 13;14:17562864211049208. doi: 10.1177/17562864211049208. eCollection 2021.
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) can be divided into a primary and secondary phase. In the primary phase, hematoma volume is evaluated and therapies are focused on reducing hematoma expansion. In the secondary, neuroprotective phase, complex systemic inflammatory cascades, direct cellular toxicity, and blood-brain barrier disruption can result in worsening perihematomal edema that can adversely affect functional outcome. To date, all major randomized phase 3 trials for ICH have targeted primary phase hematoma volume and incorporated clot evacuation, intensive blood pressure control, and hemostasis. Reasons for this lack of clinical efficacy in the major ICH trials may be due to the lack of therapeutics involving mitigation of secondary injury and inflexible trial design that favors unilateral mechanisms in a complex pathophysiology. Potential pathophysiological targets for attenuating secondary injury are highlighted in this review and include therapies increasing calcium, antagonizing microglial activation, maintaining macrophage M1 versus M2 balance by decreasing M1 signaling, aquaporin inhibition, NKCCl inhibition, endothelin receptor inhibition, Sur1-TRPM4 inhibition, matrix metalloproteinase inhibition, and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulation. Future clinical trials in ICH focusing on secondary phase injury and, potentially implementing adaptive trial design approaches with multifocal targets, may improve insight into these mechanisms and provide potential therapies that may improve survival and functional outcome.
脑出血(ICH)可分为急性期和亚急性期。在急性期,评估血肿体积,治疗重点是减少血肿扩大。在亚急性期,即神经保护期,复杂的全身炎症级联反应、直接细胞毒性和血脑屏障破坏可导致血肿周围水肿加重,进而对功能预后产生不利影响。迄今为止,所有主要的脑出血3期随机试验均以急性期血肿体积为靶点,并采用了血块清除、强化血压控制和止血措施。脑出血主要试验中临床疗效欠佳的原因可能是缺乏减轻继发性损伤的治疗方法,以及试验设计缺乏灵活性,在复杂的病理生理学中倾向于单一机制。本综述强调了减轻继发性损伤的潜在病理生理靶点,包括增加钙的疗法、拮抗小胶质细胞活化、通过减少M1信号维持巨噬细胞M1与M2平衡、水通道蛋白抑制、NKCCl抑制、内皮素受体抑制、Sur1-TRPM4抑制、基质金属蛋白酶抑制和鞘氨醇-1-磷酸受体调节。未来针对脑出血亚急性期损伤的临床试验,以及可能采用多靶点适应性试验设计方法,可能会增进对这些机制的了解,并提供可能改善生存率和功能预后的潜在治疗方法。