Suppr超能文献

肩关节上盂唇前后部手术修复后康复方案的变异性

Variability in Rehabilitation Protocols after Superior Labrum Anterior Posterior Surgical Repair.

作者信息

Hermanns Christina A, Coda Reed G, Cheema Sana, Vopat Matthew L, Tarakemeh Armin, Veazey Kyle, Schroeppel John P, Mullen Scott, Vopat Bryan G

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS.

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, KS.

出版信息

Kans J Med. 2021 Oct 14;14(3):243-248. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol14.15286. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Rehabilitation after a superior labral anterior posterior (SLAP) repair is an important aspect of patient outcomes; however, no standardized rehabilitation protocol has been defined. The purpose of this paper is to assess the variability of rehabilitation after a SLAP repair to understand the need for standardization to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

Protocols for SLAP repairs were collected through a search for Academic Orthopedic Programs and a general Google search using the terms "[Program Name (if applicable)] SLAP Repair Rehab Protocol". Protocols were compared by sling, range of motion (ROM), physical therapy, return to sport (RTS), return to throwing, and biceps engagement and tenodesis recommendations. Protocols for non-operative or generalized shoulders were excluded.

RESULTS

Sixty protocols were included. A total of 61.7% (37/60) recommended a sling for four to six weeks and 90% (54/60) included a full ROM recommendation, but time was variable. There were different exercises recommended, but pendulum swings were recommended by 53% (32/60), submaximal isometrics by 55% (33/60), and scapular strengthening by 65% (39/60). Of the sixty protocols, 33% (20/60) recommended return to sports in 24 weeks and 38.3% (23/60) recommended allowing throwing in 16 weeks.

CONCLUSIONS

There was variability in protocols for SLAP repair, especially time until full ROM, RTS, and biceps strengthening. Time in sling and scapular strengthening were the least variable. A lack of specificity within protocols in what return to throwing meant for functional ability made it difficult to compare protocols. Considering the large number of orthopedic programs, a relatively small number had published protocols. Further studies are needed to evaluate a standardized post-operative rehabilitation for SLAP repairs to improve outcomes.

摘要

引言

肩盂唇前上后下(SLAP)修复术后的康复是影响患者预后的重要因素;然而,目前尚未制定标准化的康复方案。本文旨在评估SLAP修复术后康复方案的差异,以了解标准化的必要性,从而改善患者预后。

方法

通过搜索学术骨科项目以及在谷歌上使用“[项目名称(如适用)] SLAP修复康复方案”进行常规搜索,收集SLAP修复的方案。对方案进行比较的内容包括吊带使用、活动范围(ROM)、物理治疗、恢复运动(RTS)、恢复投掷以及肱二头肌参与和固定术建议。排除非手术或一般性肩部的方案。

结果

共纳入60个方案。总计61.7%(37/60)的方案建议使用吊带4至6周,90%(54/60)的方案包含全范围活动度建议,但时间各不相同。推荐了不同的锻炼方法,53%(32/60)的方案推荐钟摆摆动,55%(33/60)推荐次最大等长收缩,65%(39/60)推荐肩胛骨强化训练。在这60个方案中,33%(20/60)的方案建议在24周后恢复运动,38.3%(23/60)的方案建议在16周后允许投掷。

结论

SLAP修复方案存在差异,尤其是达到全范围活动度、恢复运动和肱二头肌强化训练的时间。吊带使用时间和肩胛骨强化训练的差异最小。方案中对于恢复投掷对功能能力的意义缺乏明确界定,使得方案之间难以比较。考虑到骨科项目众多,已发表方案的项目相对较少。需要进一步研究来评估SLAP修复术后的标准化康复方案,以改善预后。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2ae/8523106/3891217f04f1/14-243f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验