Suppr超能文献

改良隐性失血评估在后路手术治疗伴类风湿关节炎的腰椎管狭窄症中的应用。

Modified Hidden Blood Loss Based on Drainage in Posterior Surgery on Lumbar Stenosis Syndrome with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2021 Dec;13(8):2263-2270. doi: 10.1111/os.13157. Epub 2021 Oct 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Publications on hidden blood loss (HBL) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for lumbar spine stenosis syndrome (LSS) have been reported, but the modified HBL (mHBL) was different from HBL obtained by classical formula and there are few studies on lumbar spine hemorrhage with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Therefore, the aim of our study is to respectively evaluate the importance of hidden blood loss (HBL) and modified HBL (mHBL) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in patients diagnosed with LSS and RA, to explore the correlation between RA activity and HBL as well as mHBL.

METHODS

A total of 61 patients (nine males and 52 females) diagnosed with LSS and RA who underwent PLIF were included. Data contained demographics, RA-related parameters such as duration of RA, Steinbrocker classification (used to evaluated RA activity), the disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), osteoporosis and total knee arthroplasty; operation and hemorrhage parameters. Then HBL and mHBL were calculated by Gross formula and modified formula, respectively. Subgroup analysis on HBL and mHBL was performed based on gender, age (≤60 years and ˃60 years), different number of surgical segments (single segment, double segment, and ≥3 segments), and taking DMARDs or not. ANOVA analysis was performed on HBL and mHBL in different surgery segment number and Steinbrocker classification of RA. Independent sample t-test was used in comparison of gender and age, as well as in comparison between HBL and mHBL based on whether the patient took DMARDs or not. Furthermore, paired t-test was used to compare the volume between HBL and mHBL.

RESULTS

The mean age and duration of RA was 65.2 ± 9.3 years and 14.3 ± 10.7 years, respectively. There were 13 grade I cases, 34 grade II cases, and 14 grade III cases as assessed by Steinbrocker classification and the most common anti-RA drugs were DMARDs (57.4%). The mean intraoperative bleeding, drainage, and blood loss in drainage (DBL) was 453.3 ± 377.8 mL, 489.1 ± 253.8 mL, and 304.6 ± 156.3 mL, respectively. There was no difference on HBL and mHBL in gender. HBL and mHBL was larger in patients over 60 years (P = 0.040 and P = 0.023). There were differences in intraoperative blood loss, drainage, and DBL based on different number of segments but not in HBL and mHBL, or on Steinbrocker classification. DBL was lower in DMARDs group than non-drugged group (P = 0.03), while HBL and mHBL were both of no significance. The comparison of HBL and mHBL showed statistical difference (P < 0.001), suggesting that mHBL volume is larger than HBL.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients diagnosed as LSS with RA have amounts of HBL or mHBL after PLIF. HBL or mHBL is not associated with RA activity, which may not increase in RA patients compared with common ones. Taking DMARDs may reduce postoperative DBL. The fact that mHBL is larger than HBL provides an all-round basis for measuring factual HBL.

摘要

目的

已有研究报道了腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)后路腰椎体间融合术(PLIF)后隐性失血(HBL)的相关文献,但改良的 HBL(mHBL)与经典公式得出的 HBL 不同,且类风湿关节炎(RA)患者腰椎出血的研究较少。因此,本研究旨在分别评估 LSS 和 RA 患者 PLIF 后隐性失血(HBL)和改良隐性失血(mHBL)的重要性,探讨 RA 活动度与 HBL 和 mHBL 的相关性。

方法

共纳入 61 例(9 例男性,52 例女性)诊断为 LSS 和 RA 并接受 PLIF 的患者。数据包含人口统计学、RA 相关参数(如 RA 持续时间、Steinbrocker 分级(用于评估 RA 活动度)、疾病修饰抗风湿药物(DMARDs)、骨质疏松症和全膝关节置换术)、手术和出血参数。然后分别使用 Gross 公式和改良公式计算 HBL 和 mHBL。根据性别、年龄(≤60 岁和>60 岁)、不同手术节段数(单节段、双节段和≥3 节段)、是否服用 DMARDs 进行 HBL 和 mHBL 的亚组分析。在不同手术节段数和 RA Steinbrocker 分级下对 HBL 和 mHBL 进行方差分析。性别和年龄的比较采用独立样本 t 检验,是否服用 DMARDs 的 HBL 和 mHBL 比较采用配对 t 检验。

结果

患者的平均年龄和 RA 持续时间分别为 65.2±9.3 岁和 14.3±10.7 年。Steinbrocker 分级中,13 例为 I 级,34 例为 II 级,14 例为 III 级,最常见的抗 RA 药物为 DMARDs(57.4%)。术中出血量、引流量和引流血丢失量(DBL)分别为 453.3±377.8 mL、489.1±253.8 mL 和 304.6±156.3 mL。性别对 HBL 和 mHBL 无影响。年龄>60 岁的患者 HBL 和 mHBL 更大(P=0.040 和 P=0.023)。不同手术节段数的术中出血量、引流量和 DBL 存在差异,但 HBL 和 mHBL 或 Steinbrocker 分级无差异。DMARDs 组的 DBL 低于非用药组(P=0.03),但 HBL 和 mHBL 均无统计学意义。HBL 和 mHBL 比较有统计学差异(P<0.001),提示 mHBL 量大于 HBL。

结论

后路腰椎体间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症合并 RA 的患者存在 HBL 或 mHBL。HBL 或 mHBL 与 RA 活动度无关,与普通患者相比,RA 患者可能不会增加。服用 DMARDs 可能会减少术后 DBL。mHBL 大于 HBL 的事实为实际 HBL 的测量提供了全面的依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9034/8654656/36d255be7327/OS-13-2263-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验