• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估拥有私人保险的美国成年人对精神健康与医疗健康计划网络的看法。

Assessment of Perceptions of Mental Health vs Medical Health Plan Networks Among US Adults With Private Insurance.

机构信息

Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut.

Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2130770. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30770.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30770
PMID:34677592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8536951/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Ten years after the Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act, patients continue to report insurance-related barriers to specialty mental health care.

OBJECTIVES

To assess privately insured patients' perceptions of the adequacy of their health plan's provider network (provider network includes physicians, clinicians, other health care professionals, and their institutions that constitute the network), whether practitioners frequently leave plans, and whether practitioner plan participation affected patients' plan choice.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative, population-based internet survey study of English-speaking US adults participating in KnowledgePanel, an online research panel, was conducted from August to September 2018. Data analysis was performed from November 12, 2020, to May 12, 2021. From a sample of 29 854 panelists aged 18 to 64 years, 19 602 initiated the screener (completion rate of 66%), and 728 met study criteria: adults with private insurance receiving both specialty mental health and medical care in the past year.

EXPOSURE

Health plan's provider network.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Self-report of plan inadequacy, whether a practitioner left the plan and the participant's responses (stopped treatment, switched practitioner, or continued treatment), and whether participation of a specific practitioner was considered when a health plan was chosen. Experiences with both mental health and medical provider networks were assessed. Analyses were weighted to match the sample to the US population. Weights provided by KnowledgePanel were also adjusted for panel recruitment, attrition, oversampling, and survey nonresponse.

RESULTS

Of a total of 728 study participants, 204 (39%) were aged 18 to 34 years, 504 (61%) were women, 82 (17%) were Hispanic, and 551 (66%) were non-Hispanic White individuals. Serious psychological distress was reported by 262 participants (36%), and 214 participants (29%) also received mental health treatment from a primary care practitioner. Participants rated their mental health provider network as inadequate more frequently than their medical provider network (163 [21%] vs 70 [10%]; odds ratio [OR], 2.69; 95% CI, 1.64-4.40; P < .001). However, among the 193 participants also receiving mental health treatment from a primary care practitioner, there was no significant difference in the ratings of mental health and medical provider networks (44 [14%] vs 18 [9%]; OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 0.65-3.67; P = .32). Sixty participants (8%) reported that a mental health practitioner had left their plan's insurance network in the past 3 years. Of the 523 participants with a choice of plan, 98 (20%) considered whether a specific mental health practitioner was in network before choosing a plan.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study's findings suggest that more participants perceived their mental health networks to be inadequate compared with their medical networks. Increasing the availability of mental health treatment in primary care practices may aid plans in constructing adequate mental health provider networks and improve patient access to mental health care.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/462d/8536951/c9761477af32/jamanetwopen-e2130770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/462d/8536951/d93a5a7114b4/jamanetwopen-e2130770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/462d/8536951/c9761477af32/jamanetwopen-e2130770-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/462d/8536951/d93a5a7114b4/jamanetwopen-e2130770-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/462d/8536951/c9761477af32/jamanetwopen-e2130770-g002.jpg
摘要

重要性

在《精神健康和平等与成瘾权益法案》颁布 10 年后,患者仍然报告保险相关的专业精神保健障碍。

目的

评估私人保险患者对其健康计划提供网络的充足性的看法(提供网络包括构成网络的医生、临床医生、其他卫生保健专业人员及其机构)、从业者是否经常离开计划,以及从业者的计划参与是否影响患者的计划选择。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项全国性的、基于人群的、针对参加 KnowledgePanel 的英语美国成年人的互联网调查研究,KnowledgePanel 是一个在线研究小组,从 2018 年 8 月至 9 月进行。数据分析于 2020 年 11 月 12 日至 2021 年 5 月 12 日进行。从 29854 名年龄在 18 至 64 岁的小组参与者中,有 19602 名启动了筛选器(完成率为 66%),有 728 名符合研究标准:过去一年接受私人保险并接受专科精神保健和医疗服务的成年人。

暴露

健康计划的提供网络。

主要结果和测量

计划不足的自我报告、从业者是否离开计划以及参与者的反应(停止治疗、更换从业者或继续治疗),以及在选择健康计划时是否考虑了特定从业者的参与。评估了心理健康和医疗提供网络的经验。分析加权以匹配样本与美国人口。KnowledgePanel 提供的权重还针对小组招募、人员流失、过采样和调查无应答进行了调整。

结果

在总共 728 名研究参与者中,有 204 名(39%)年龄在 18 至 34 岁,504 名(61%)为女性,82 名(17%)为西班牙裔,551 名(66%)为非西班牙裔白人。有 262 名参与者(36%)报告有严重的心理困扰,214 名参与者(29%)也接受过初级保健从业者的心理健康治疗。参与者对其心理健康提供者网络的评价不如对其医疗提供者网络的评价那么不足(163 [21%] 对 70 [10%];比值比[OR],2.69;95%置信区间[CI],1.64-4.40;P<0.001)。然而,在接受初级保健从业者心理健康治疗的 193 名参与者中,心理健康和医疗提供者网络的评分没有显著差异(44 [14%] 对 18 [9%];OR,1.55;95% CI,0.65-3.67;P=0.32)。有 60 名(8%)参与者报告说,过去 3 年内,心理健康从业者已经离开他们计划的保险网络。在有计划选择的 523 名参与者中,有 98 名(20%)在选择计划之前考虑了特定的心理健康从业者是否在网络中。

结论和相关性

这项研究的结果表明,与医疗网络相比,更多的参与者认为他们的心理健康网络不足。增加初级保健实践中精神健康治疗的可及性可能有助于计划构建足够的精神健康提供者网络,并改善患者获得精神保健的机会。

相似文献

1
Assessment of Perceptions of Mental Health vs Medical Health Plan Networks Among US Adults With Private Insurance.评估拥有私人保险的美国成年人对精神健康与医疗健康计划网络的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2130770. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.30770.
2
Does Primary Care Fill the Gap in Access to Specialty Mental Health Care? A Mixed Methods Study.初级保健能否填补专科精神卫生保健服务的空白?一项混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 May;37(7):1641-1647. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07260-z. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
3
Out-of-network provider use more likely in mental health than general health care among privately insured.在私人保险中,精神健康领域的医疗机构外服务使用率高于一般健康护理。
Med Care. 2013 Aug;51(8):699-705. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31829a4f73.
4
Managed care, primary care, and the patient-practitioner relationship.管理式医疗、初级保健与医患关系。
J Gen Intern Med. 2002 Apr;17(4):270-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10309.x.
5
Association Between Health Insurance Literacy and Avoidance of Health Care Services Owing to Cost.健康保险素养与因费用而避免医疗服务之间的关联。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Nov 2;1(7):e184796. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4796.
6
Networks In ACA Marketplaces Are Narrower For Mental Health Care Than For Primary Care.在 ACA 市场中,心理健康护理的网络比初级护理更窄。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1624-1631. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0325.
7
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
8
How Do Private Health Plans Manage Specialty Behavioral Health Treatment Entry and Continuing Care?私人健康计划如何管理专科行为健康治疗的准入和持续护理?
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Sep 1;68(9):931-937. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600081. Epub 2017 May 15.
9
Cost-Sharing Disparities for Out-of-Network Care for Adults With Behavioral Health Conditions.网络外行为健康护理的费用分担差距:成人视角
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14554.
10
Can high quality overcome consumer resistance to restricted provider access? Evidence from a health plan choice experiment.高质量能否克服消费者对受限医疗服务提供者选择的抵触情绪?来自一项健康计划选择实验的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):551-71. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00037.

引用本文的文献

1
Medicaid managed care organizations' experiences with network adequacy.医疗补助管理式医疗组织在网络充足性方面的经验。
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Mar 13;3(4):qxaf049. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf049. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Trends in Emergency Department, Primary Care, and Behavioral Health Use for Pediatric Mental Health Conditions in Virginia before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情之前及期间弗吉尼亚州儿科心理健康状况在急诊科、初级保健及行为健康方面的就诊趋势
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Feb 26;26(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02733-0.
3
Insurance acceptance and cash pay rates for psychotherapy in the US.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation In The Effectiveness Of Collaborative Care For Depression: Does It Matter Where You Get Your Care?抑郁症协作护理效果的差异:在哪里接受护理重要吗?
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Nov;39(11):1943-1950. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01714.
2
Incorrect Provider Directories Associated With Out-Of-Network Mental Health Care And Outpatient Surprise Bills.与网络外心理健康护理和门诊意外账单相关的错误医疗服务提供者名录
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jun;39(6):975-983. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01501.
3
Cost-Sharing Disparities for Out-of-Network Care for Adults With Behavioral Health Conditions.
美国心理治疗的保险承保情况及现金支付率。
Health Aff Sch. 2024 Sep 9;2(9):qxae110. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxae110. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Psychiatrist Networks In Medicare Advantage Plans Are Substantially Narrower Than In Medicaid And ACA Markets.在医疗保险优势计划中,精神科医生网络的范围明显小于医疗补助和 ACA 市场。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Jul;42(7):909-918. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01547.
5
Mental Health Service Utilization and Disparities in the U.S: Observation of the First Year into the COVID Pandemic.美国精神卫生服务的利用与差异:新冠大流行第一年的观察。
Community Ment Health J. 2023 Jul;59(5):972-985. doi: 10.1007/s10597-022-01081-y. Epub 2023 Jan 7.
6
Incorrect Grant Number in Funding/Support.资助/支持中的拨款编号错误。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jul 1;5(7):e2227336. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.27336.
网络外行为健康护理的费用分担差距:成人视角
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Nov 1;2(11):e1914554. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14554.
4
A Knotty Problem: Consumer Access and the Regulation of Provider Networks.一个棘手的问题:消费者的准入与医疗服务提供方网络的监管。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2019 Dec 1;44(6):937-954. doi: 10.1215/03616878-7785835.
5
Decision-Making Experiences Of Consumers Choosing Individual-Market Health Insurance Plans.消费者选择个体医疗保险计划的决策体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Mar;38(3):464-472. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05036.
6
Medicare Advantage And Commercial Prices For Mental Health Services.医疗保险优势计划和精神健康服务的商业价格。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2019 Feb;38(2):262-267. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05226.
7
Continuity of care as experienced by mental health service users - a qualitative study.心理健康服务使用者所体验到的连续性照护——一项质性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):763. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2719-9.
8
Networks In ACA Marketplaces Are Narrower For Mental Health Care Than For Primary Care.在 ACA 市场中,心理健康护理的网络比初级护理更窄。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1624-1631. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0325.
9
Population Of US Practicing Psychiatrists Declined, 2003-13, Which May Help Explain Poor Access To Mental Health Care.2003年至2013年期间,美国执业精神科医生的数量有所下降,这可能有助于解释心理健康护理服务难以获得的原因。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jul 1;35(7):1271-7. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1643.
10
Achieving Mental Health Care Parity Might Require Changes In Payments And Competition.实现精神卫生保健平权可能需要在支付和竞争方面做出改变。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 Jun 1;35(6):1029-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0012.