van Twist Daan J L, Harms Mark P M, van Wijnen Veera K, Claydon Victoria E, Freeman Roy, Cheshire William P, Wieling Wouter
Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, PO-box 5500, 6130 MB, Sittard, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Clin Auton Res. 2021 Dec;31(6):685-698. doi: 10.1007/s10286-021-00833-2. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
Abnormalities in orthostatic blood pressure changes upon active standing are associated with morbidity, mortality, and reduced quality of life. However, over the last decade, several population-based cohort studies have reported a remarkably high prevalence (between 25 and 70%) of initial orthostatic hypotension (IOH) among elderly individuals. This has raised the question as to whether the orthostatic blood pressure patterns in these community-dwelling elderly should truly be considered as pathological. If not, redefining of the systolic cutoff values for IOH (i.e., a value ≥ 40 mmHg in systolic blood pressure in the first 15 s after standing up) might be necessary to differ between normal aging and true pathology. Therefore, in this narrative review, we provide a critical analysis of the current reference values for the changes in systolic BP in the first 60 s after standing up and discuss how these values should be applied to large population studies. We will address factors that influence the magnitude of the systolic blood pressure changes following active standing and the importance of standardization of the stand-up test, which is a prerequisite for quantitative, between-subject comparisons of the postural hemodynamic response.
主动站立时体位性血压变化异常与发病率、死亡率及生活质量下降相关。然而,在过去十年中,多项基于人群的队列研究报告称,老年人群中初始体位性低血压(IOH)的患病率极高(25%至70%)。这就引发了一个问题,即这些社区居住老年人的体位性血压模式是否真的应被视为病理性的。如果不是,可能有必要重新定义IOH的收缩压临界值(即站立后最初15秒内收缩压≥40 mmHg),以便区分正常衰老和真正的病理状态。因此,在这篇叙述性综述中,我们对站立后最初60秒内收缩压变化的当前参考值进行了批判性分析,并讨论了这些值应如何应用于大规模人群研究。我们将探讨影响主动站立后收缩压变化幅度的因素以及站立试验标准化的重要性,这是进行姿势血液动力学反应的定量、受试者间比较的先决条件。