Artun J, Osterberg S K
J Periodontol. 1987 Jan;58(1):24-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.1987.58.1.24.
The present study was undertaken to examine the long-term periodontal status of teeth orthodontically moved into extraction sites. Patients were examined 14 to 34 years after active orthodontic treatment involving extraction of four first premolars. Three groups were established: one with closed tooth contacts and parallel adjacent teeth, one with closed tooth contacts and tipped adjacent teeth, and one with open contacts between adjacent teeth. Within each group accumulation of plaque, gingival health status, probing pocket depth, and probing attachment level of interproximal tooth surfaces, facing extraction sites and adjacent control sites between canine and lateral incisor were compared. Significantly more probing attachment loss was found in extraction sites with open tooth contacts (P less than 0.01) and with parallel adjacent teeth and closed tooth contacts (P less than 0.05) than in control sites. However, the mean differences were less than 0.5 mm, which may not be considered clinically significant. Tipping of teeth into the extraction sites had no long-term detrimental effect on the probing attachment level. No differences in accumulation of plaque and in gingival health status were observed.
本研究旨在检查正畸移动至拔牙位点的牙齿的长期牙周状况。在拔除四颗第一前磨牙的主动正畸治疗后14至34年对患者进行检查。设立了三组:一组为牙齿接触紧密且相邻牙齿平行,一组为牙齿接触紧密且相邻牙齿倾斜,一组为相邻牙齿间有间隙。在每组中,比较了菌斑堆积、牙龈健康状况、探诊袋深度以及邻面牙面(面向拔牙位点以及尖牙与侧切牙之间的相邻对照位点)的探诊附着水平。发现牙齿接触间隙开放的拔牙位点以及相邻牙齿平行且牙齿接触紧密的拔牙位点的探诊附着丧失显著多于对照位点(P小于0.01)以及相邻牙齿倾斜且牙齿接触紧密的拔牙位点(P小于0.05)。然而,平均差异小于0.5mm,这在临床上可能不被认为具有显著意义。将牙齿倾斜移动至拔牙位点对探诊附着水平没有长期的不利影响。未观察到菌斑堆积和牙龈健康状况方面的差异。