Stasiowski Michał Jan, Szumera Izabela, Wardas Piotr, Król Seweryn, Żak Jakub, Missir Anna, Pluta Aleksandra, Niewiadomska Ewa, Krawczyk Lech, Jałowiecki Przemysław, Grabarek Beniamin Oskar
Chair and Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, 5th Regional Hospital, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland.
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 13;10(20):4683. doi: 10.3390/jcm10204683.
Inadequate intraoperative analgesia causes the deterioration of the condition of the surgical field (CSF) as a result of hemodynamic instability. Analgesia monitors are used to guide remifentanil) infusion to optimize intraoperative analgesia. The main aim of the current randomized controlled trial was to investigate the potential advantages of intraoperative analgesia monitoring using surgical Pleth index (SPI)- or pupillometry (PRD)-guided remifentanil administration for managing the volume of total intraoperative blood loss (TEIBL), CSF, and length of operation (LOP) in comparison with the standard practice in patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). The 89 patients in our study were grouped as follows: 30 patients were assigned to the general analgesia (GA) group, 31 patients were assigned to the SPI group, and 28 patients were assigned to the PRD group. The speed of remifentanil infusion was accelerated by 50% when SPI, PRD, or BSS were increased by >15 points, >5%, or >2, respectively, in adjacent groups until their normalization. The SPI group showed significantly lower TEIBL in comparison to the GA group (165.2 ± 100.2 vs. 283.3 ± 193.5 mL; < 0.05) and a higher mean arterial pressure (MAP; 73.9 ± 8 vs. 69.2 ± 6.8 mmHg; < 0.05). In the PRD group, a shorter LOP compared with the GA group was observed (63.1 ± 26.7 min vs. 82.6 ± 33.1 min; < 0.05). It was noted that the PRD group had a lower total remifentanil consumption than the SPI group (1.3 ± 1.4 vs. 1.8 ± 0.9 mg; < 0.05). In ASA I-III patients undergoing ESS, intraoperative monitoring based on state entropy and SPI values can optimize the CSF and reduce TEIBL, whereas monitoring based on state entropy and PRD measurements can optimize the cost effectiveness of anesthetic drugs and the use of the operation room.
术中镇痛不足会因血流动力学不稳定导致术野状况(CSF)恶化。镇痛监测仪用于指导瑞芬太尼输注,以优化术中镇痛。当前这项随机对照试验的主要目的是,与接受鼻内镜手术(ESS)患者的标准做法相比,研究使用手术容积脉搏指数(SPI)或瞳孔测量法(PRD)指导瑞芬太尼给药进行术中镇痛监测,在控制术中总失血量(TEIBL)、CSF及手术时长(LOP)方面的潜在优势。我们研究中的89例患者分组如下:30例患者被分配至全身镇痛(GA)组,31例患者被分配至SPI组,28例患者被分配至PRD组。当相邻组的SPI、PRD或BSS分别增加>15个点、>5%或>2时,瑞芬太尼输注速度加快50%,直至其恢复正常。与GA组相比,SPI组的TEIBL显著更低(165.2±100.2 vs. 283.3±193.5 mL;<0.05),平均动脉压(MAP)更高(73.9±8 vs. 69.2±6.8 mmHg;<0.05)。在PRD组中,观察到与GA组相比LOP更短(63.1±26.7分钟 vs. 82.6±33.1分钟;<0.05)。值得注意的是,PRD组的瑞芬太尼总消耗量低于SPI组(1.3±1.4 vs. 1.8±0.9 mg;<0.05)。在接受ESS的ASA I - III级患者中,基于状态熵和SPI值的术中监测可优化CSF并减少TEIBL,而基于状态熵和PRD测量的监测可优化麻醉药物的成本效益及手术室使用。