Bahrami Mohsen, Abenojar Juana, Martínez Miguel Angel
Materials Science and Engineering and Chemical Engineering Department, University Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganes, Spain.
Mechanical Engineering Department, ICAI, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28015 Madrid, Spain.
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 15;13(20):3553. doi: 10.3390/polym13203553.
Chemically speaking, polyamide 11 (PA11) and polyamide 12 (PA12) have a similar backbone, differing only in one carbon. From an origin point of view, PA11 is considered a bioplastic polyamide composed from renewable resources, compared to oil-based PA12. Each of them has a number of advantages over the other, which makes their selection a challenging issue. Depending on the target application, diverse assessments and comparisons are needed to fulfill this mission. The current study addresses this research gap to characterize and compare PA11 and PA12 manufactured by the hot press technique in terms of their mechanical, thermal and durability properties for the first time, demonstrating their potential for future works as matrices in composite materials. In this regard, different characterization techniques are applied to the hot-pressed polymer sheets, including X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mechanical performance of the PA11 and PA12 sheets is compared based on tensile tests and shore hardness measurement. The durability behavior of these two polyamides is evaluated in water and relative humidity conditions at different aging times. The experimental results show the ductile behavior of PA12 with respect to the quasi-brittle PA11. Both have a relatively small water and moisture gain: 1.5 wt% and 0.8 wt%, respectively. The higher crystallinity of PA12 (2.1 times more than PA11) with γ-phase is one of the leading parameters to achieve better mechanical and durability properties. The FTIR spectra displayed slight acid hydrolysis. Accordingly, absorbed water or moisture does not cause plasticization; thus, neither hardness nor dimension changes.
从化学角度来讲,聚酰胺11(PA11)和聚酰胺12(PA12)具有相似的主链,仅相差一个碳原子。从来源角度来看,与石油基PA12相比,PA11被认为是一种由可再生资源制成的生物塑料聚酰胺。它们各自都有优于对方的诸多优点,这使得对它们的选择成为一个具有挑战性的问题。根据目标应用的不同,需要进行各种评估和比较才能完成这项任务。当前的研究填补了这一研究空白,首次对通过热压技术制造的PA11和PA12的机械、热和耐久性性能进行表征和比较,展示了它们未来作为复合材料基体的潜力。在这方面,将不同的表征技术应用于热压聚合物片材,包括X射线衍射(XRD)、差示扫描量热法(DSC)、傅里叶变换红外光谱法(FTIR)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)。基于拉伸试验和肖氏硬度测量对PA11和PA12片材的机械性能进行比较。在不同老化时间的水和相对湿度条件下评估这两种聚酰胺的耐久性行为。实验结果表明,PA12相对于准脆性的PA11具有韧性行为。两者的水和湿气增重都相对较小,分别为1.5 wt%和0.8 wt%。具有γ相的PA12的较高结晶度(比PA11高2.1倍)是实现更好的机械和耐久性性能的主要参数之一。FTIR光谱显示有轻微的酸水解。因此,吸收的水或湿气不会导致增塑;因此,硬度和尺寸都不会改变。