TUM School of Management, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Climate Finance and Policy Group, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zurich, Switzerland.
Nat Commun. 2021 Oct 22;12(1):6149. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26349-x.
Global greenhouse gas emissions need to reach net-zero around mid-century to limit global warming to 1.5 °C. This decarbonization challenge has, inter alia, increased the political and societal pressure on companies to disclose their carbon footprints. As a response, numerous companies announced roadmaps to become carbon neutral or even negative. The first step on the journey towards carbon neutrality, however, is to quantify corporate emissions accurately. Current carbon accounting and reporting practices remain unsystematic and not comparable, particularly for emissions along the value chain (so-called scope 3). Here we present a framework to harmonize scope 3 emissions by accounting for reporting inconsistency, boundary incompleteness, and activity exclusion. In a case study of the tech sector, we find that corporate reports omit half of the total emissions. The framework we present may help companies, investors, and policy makers to identify and close the gaps in corporate carbon footprints.
全球温室气体排放需要在本世纪中叶达到净零排放,才能将全球变暖限制在 1.5°C 以内。这一脱碳挑战增加了企业披露碳足迹的政治和社会压力。作为回应,许多公司宣布了实现碳中和甚至负排放的路线图。然而,迈向碳中和的第一步是准确量化企业排放。目前的碳核算和报告实践仍然缺乏系统性,也无法进行比较,特别是在价值链中的排放(所谓的范围 3)。在这里,我们提出了一个框架,通过核算报告不一致性、边界不完整性和活动排除,来协调范围 3 的排放。在对科技行业的案例研究中,我们发现公司报告遗漏了一半的总排放量。我们提出的框架可以帮助公司、投资者和政策制定者识别和弥补企业碳足迹中的差距。