Cui Christina L, Yei Kevin S, Janssen Claire B, Ramachandran Mokhshan, Siracuse Jeffrey J, Malas Mahmoud B
University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;79:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.08.034. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
Racial disparities in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) continue to persist. We aimed to provide a large-scale analysis of racial disparities in perioperative outcomes of carotid revascularization in a nationally representative cohort of patients, with sub-analyses stratifying by procedure type and symptomatic status.
We studied all patients undergoing carotid revascularization between 2011 and 2018 in the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database. Univariate methods were used to compare patients' demographic and medical characteristics. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare adjusted perioperative outcomes between white patients (WP) and non-white patients (NWP). Sub-analysis was performed stratifying by method of revascularization and symptomatic status.
A total of 31,356 carotid revascularizations were performed in 26,550 (84.7%) white patients and 4,806 (15.3%) non-white patients. On adjusted analysis, NWP had increased odds of stroke (OR:1.2, 95%CI:1.1-1.5, P = 0.0496), unplanned return to the OR (OR:1.4, 95%CI:1.1-1.6, P < 0.001) and restenosis (OR:2.6, 95%CI:1.7-3.9, P < 0.001). On sub-analysis, NWP undergoing CAS had increased odds of stroke/death (OR:2.2, 95%CI:1.1-4.3, P = 0.025), stroke (OR:2.9, 95%CI:1.3-6.0, P = 0.007), and stroke/TIA (OR:2.1, 95%CI:1.0-4.2, P = 0.025). NWP undergoing CEA had increased odds of unplanned return to the OR (OR:1.4, 95%CI:1.2-1.6, P < 0.001) and restenosis (OR:2.7, 95%CI:1.7-4.0, P < 0.001).
NWP had higher rates of 30-day stroke, driven primarily by higher rates of perioperative stroke/death in NWP undergoing CAS. NWP undergoing CEA did not have higher rates of stroke/death after adjusted analysis, although they had higher rates of unplanned return to OR and restenosis. Upon stratification for symptomatic status, the stroke/death rate between NWP and WP was shown to be non-significant.
颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)和颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)中的种族差异仍然存在。我们旨在对全国代表性患者队列中颈动脉血运重建围手术期结局的种族差异进行大规模分析,并按手术类型和症状状态进行亚分析。
我们研究了2011年至2018年在美国外科医师学会(ACS)国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)数据库中接受颈动脉血运重建的所有患者。采用单变量方法比较患者的人口统计学和医学特征。多变量逻辑回归分析用于比较白人患者(WP)和非白人患者(NWP)调整后的围手术期结局。按血运重建方法和症状状态进行亚分析。
共对26550名(84.7%)白人患者和4806名(15.3%)非白人患者进行了31356例颈动脉血运重建术。经调整分析,非白人患者发生卒中的几率增加(比值比:1.2,95%置信区间:1.1 - 1.5,P = 0.0496)、非计划重返手术室的几率增加(比值比:1.4,95%置信区间:1.1 - 1.6,P < 0.001)以及再狭窄的几率增加(比值比:2.6,95%置信区间:1.7 - 3.9,P < 0.001)。亚分析显示,接受CAS的非白人患者发生卒中/死亡的几率增加(比值比:2.2,95%置信区间:1.1 - 4.3,P = 0.025)、发生卒中的几率增加(比值比:2.9,95%置信区间:1.3 - 6.0,P = 0.007)以及发生卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作的几率增加(比值比:2.1,95%置信区间:1.0 - 4.2,P = 0.025)。接受CEA的非白人患者非计划重返手术室的几率增加(比值比:1.4,95%置信区间:1.2 - 1.6,P < 0.001)以及再狭窄的几率增加(比值比:2.7, 95%置信区间:1.7 - 4.0,P < 0.001)。
非白人患者30天卒中发生率较高,主要原因是接受CAS的非白人患者围手术期卒中/死亡发生率较高。经调整分析,接受CEA的非白人患者卒中/死亡发生率并未升高,尽管他们非计划重返手术室和再狭窄的发生率较高。按症状状态分层后,非白人患者和白人患者之间的卒中/死亡率无显著差异。