Suppr超能文献

新鲜周期移植中,囊胚期移植与卵裂期胚胎移植的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Single blastocyst stage versus single cleavage stage embryo transfer following fresh transfer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Assisted Reproduction Center, Eastern Hospital, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610101, China.

Department of Urology, Sichuan Academy of Medical Science & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, China.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Dec;267:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.004. Epub 2021 Oct 6.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the available evidence of the effectiveness of single blastocyst stage transfer against the effectiveness of single cleavage stage embryo transfer.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic research based on Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed until May 2, 2020 to identify all relevant studies. The Cochrane Collaboration's Review Manager (RevMan) 5.0.2 software was used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in analysis, involving 1784 patients in total, who were divided into 2 groups, which were the single blastocyst stage transfer (SBT) group of 932, and the single cleavage stage transfer (SCT) group of 852. Our meta-analysis concluded that SBT group had a significantly higher clinical pregnancy rate (RR 1.26; 95%CI: 1.14-1.39), ongoing pregnancy rate (RR 1.19; 95%CI: 1.05-1.35) and delivery rate (RR 1.4; 95%CI: 1.13-1.75) than SCT group during the fresh transfer. While miscarriage rate (RR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66-1.33), multiple pregnancy rate (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.51-2.45) and ectopic pregnancy rate (RR, 0.5; 95% CI: 0.13-1.90) between two groups showed no significant difference. However, the SCT group contained notably more cryopreserved embryos than the SBT group. (RR -0.68, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that single blastocyst stage transfer is associated with higher ongoing pregnancy rate and delivery rate comparing to single cleavage stage transfer in the clinical practice. Due to the low quality of the evidence of the primary outcomes, other higher-quality lager RCTs are necessary before a fully informed decision is made.

摘要

目的

比较单囊胚期移植与单卵裂期胚胎移植的有效性的现有证据。

研究设计

基于 Pubmed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了系统研究,检索截至 2020 年 5 月 2 日的所有相关研究。使用 Cochrane 协作网的 Review Manager(RevMan)5.0.2 软件进行统计分析。

结果

共纳入 5 项随机对照试验(RCT),共 1784 例患者,分为两组,即单囊胚期移植(SBT)组 932 例和单卵裂期移植(SCT)组 852 例。我们的荟萃分析得出结论,SBT 组的临床妊娠率(RR 1.26;95%CI:1.14-1.39)、持续妊娠率(RR 1.19;95%CI:1.05-1.35)和分娩率(RR 1.4;95%CI:1.13-1.75)显著高于 SCT 组。然而,两组间流产率(RR 0.93;95%CI:0.66-1.33)、多胎妊娠率(RR 1.12;95%CI:0.51-2.45)和异位妊娠率(RR 0.5;95%CI:0.13-1.90)无显著差异。然而,SCT 组的冷冻胚胎数量明显多于 SBT 组(RR-0.68,95%CI:-0.95 至-0.41)。

结论

我们的结果表明,与单卵裂期胚胎移植相比,单囊胚期移植在临床实践中具有更高的持续妊娠率和分娩率。由于主要结局的证据质量较低,在做出完全知情的决策之前,需要进行其他更高质量的大型 RCT。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验