Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Zurich University of Applied Sciences, School of Health Professions, Institute of Physiotherapy, Katharina-Sulzer-Platz 9, 8401 Winterthur, Switzerland.
Gait Posture. 2022 Jan;91:131-136. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.10.009. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Achilles tendon injuries are commonly treated with stability boots that secure the ankle at a specific position and aim to reduce loading of the tendon. These boots allow full weight bearing by limiting the range of movement. It is, however, unknown, to what extent these boots can reduce tendon loading and if the biomechanics are altered during walking.
How do orthopedic boots influence lower extremity biomechanics during walking?
For this cross-sectional study, ten healthy participants walked with three orthopedic boots (Oped Vacoped, Kuenzli Ortho Rehab Absolut, Orthotech Variostabil) commonly used to treat Achilles tendon injuries. Kinematics and kinetics of the lower extremity of the booted leg and spatiotemporal parameters of both sides were collected using motion-capturing system and dynamometry. Each boot was tested in the maximally plantarflexed position. Group differences between boot conditions were analyzed by means of repeated-measures ANOVA and post-hoc paired t-test.
The boot dorsiflexion range of motion differed significantly between boots with Vacoped (1.8° (0.3)) showing the smallest range, followed by Kuenzli (5.0° (1.3)) and Orthotech (7.9° (1.7)). Orthotech displayed a higher peak plantarflexion moment (1.36 Nm/kg (0.09)) than both Kuenzli (1.06 Nm/kg (0.12)) and Vacoped (1.04 Nm/kg (0.14)). Concerning loading over time, significant differences in the plantarflexion impulse were found, with the highest impulse in Vacoped (0.42 Nms/kg (0.06)), followed by Orthotech (0.29 Nms/kg (0.03)) and Kuenzli (0.25 Nms/kg (0.05)). In addition, asymmetries were seen in stance and step length for the booted and contralateral sides.
The lower extremity biomechanics were affected by the boots, with Kuenzli showing the lowest joint loading, Vacoped the smallest joint motion and Orthotech the most natural gait pattern. Future research is needed to determine the most relevant variable expressing the risk of re-rupture of the Achilles tendon in order to conclude which boot may be most favorable to use in clinical practice.
跟腱损伤通常采用稳定靴进行治疗,这种靴子可将踝关节固定在特定位置,从而减少跟腱的负荷。这些靴子通过限制运动范围来实现完全负重。然而,目前尚不清楚这些靴子在多大程度上可以减少跟腱的负荷,以及在行走过程中生物力学是否会发生改变。
矫形靴在行走时如何影响下肢的生物力学?
在这项横断面研究中,10 名健康参与者穿着三种矫形靴(Oped Vacoped、Kuenzli Ortho Rehab Absolut、Orthotech Variostabil)进行行走测试,这三种矫形靴常用于治疗跟腱损伤。使用运动捕捉系统和测力板收集被试者穿靴腿的下肢运动学和动力学以及双侧的时空参数。在最大跖屈位置下测试每种靴子。采用重复测量方差分析和事后配对 t 检验分析靴间的组间差异。
三种矫形靴的背屈活动范围存在显著差异,其中 Vacoped(1.8°(0.3))的范围最小,其次是 Kuenzli(5.0°(1.3))和 Orthotech(7.9°(1.7))。Orthotech 的峰值跖屈力矩(1.36 Nm/kg(0.09))明显高于 Kuenzli(1.06 Nm/kg(0.12))和 Vacoped(1.04 Nm/kg(0.14))。就时间上的负荷而言,跖屈冲量存在显著差异,Vacoped 的冲量最大(0.42 Nms/kg(0.06)),其次是 Orthotech(0.29 Nms/kg(0.03))和 Kuenzli(0.25 Nms/kg(0.05))。此外,穿靴侧和对侧的支撑相和步长也存在不对称。
矫形靴会影响下肢的生物力学,其中 Kuenzli 的关节负荷最低,Vacoped 的关节活动度最小,而 Orthotech 的步态模式最自然。未来的研究需要确定最相关的变量来表达跟腱再次断裂的风险,从而得出哪种靴子在临床实践中最有利。