Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jul;42(5):785-792. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1968810. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
An alternative surgical technique with closure of the uterine artery at its origin, known as lateral approach prior to TLH, has been proposed and it may offer important benefits to both patients and surgeons. Our objectives were to review the current literature regarding surgical outcomes between lateral and conventional approach in relation to TLH. We followed the 'PRISMA' guidelines and conducted a systematic review, which involved searching PubMed and Embase databases for RCTs evaluating the topic. We identified four RCTs including 585 patients. Three of the four studies reported a significant lower bleeding during TLH with prior lateral approach. Operative time was also shorter in the lateral approach group compared to the conventional approach group in three studies.Our review provides evidence that lateral occlusion of the uterine arteries prior to total laparoscopic hysterectomy may be beneficial due to less blood loss and shorter perioperative time without compromising patient safety.
一种在 TLH 之前对子宫动脉进行起源处结扎的替代手术技术,即侧入路,已被提出,它可能对患者和外科医生都有重要的益处。我们的目的是回顾关于 TLH 中侧入路与传统入路手术结果的现有文献。我们遵循“PRISMA”指南进行了系统评价,检索了评估该主题的 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库。我们共纳入了 4 项 RCT,包括 585 名患者。其中 3 项研究报道了在 TLH 前采用侧入路时术中出血量显著减少。3 项研究中,侧入路组的手术时间也短于传统入路组。我们的综述提供了证据表明,在全腹腔镜子宫切除术前行子宫动脉侧结扎可能有益,因为它可以减少术中出血量和缩短围手术期时间,而不影响患者安全性。