Suppr超能文献

直肠癌手术后在转流性回肠造口处使用锚定缝线对后续回肠造口还纳时腹膜粘连的影响。

Effects of anchoring sutures at diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery on peritoneal adhesion at following ileostomy reversal.

作者信息

Choi Eu-Tteum, Lim Seok-Byung, Lee Jong Lyul, Kim Chan Wook, Kim Young Il, Yoon Yong Sik, Park In Ja, Yu Chang Sik, Kim Jin Cheon

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Oct;101(4):214-220. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.4.214. Epub 2021 Oct 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

During diverting ileostomy reversal for rectal cancer patients who underwent previous sphincter-saving surgery, the extent of adhesion formation around the ileostomy site affects operative and postoperative outcomes. Anchoring sutures placed at the time of the ileostomy procedure may reduce adhesions around the ileostomy. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of anchoring sutures on the degree of adhesion formation and the postoperative course at the time of ileostomy reversal.

METHODS

Patients who underwent sphincter-saving surgery with diverting ileostomy for rectal cancer between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled. Variables including the peritoneal dhesion index (PAI) score, operation time, the length of resected small bowel, operative complications, and postoperative hospital stay were collected prospectively and compared between the anchoring group (AG) and non-anchoring group (NAG).

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included in this study, with 60 and 30 patients in the AG and NAG, respectively. The AG had shorter mean operation time (46.88 ± 16.37 minutes 61.53 ± 19.36 minutes, P = 0.001) and lower mean PAI score (3.02 ± 2.53 5.80 ± 2.60, P = 0.001), compared with the NAG. There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the AG and NAG (5.0% 13.3%, respectively; P = 0.240).

CONCLUSION

Anchoring sutures at the formation of a diverting ileostomy could decrease the adhesion score and operation time at ileostomy reversal, thus may be effective in improving perioperative outcomes.

摘要

目的

对于先前接受保留括约肌手术的直肠癌患者,在回肠转流造口还纳术中,回肠造口部位周围粘连形成的程度会影响手术及术后结果。在回肠造口手术时放置固定缝线可能会减少回肠造口周围的粘连。本研究旨在评估固定缝线对回肠造口还纳时粘连形成程度及术后病程的影响。

方法

纳入2013年1月至2017年12月期间因直肠癌接受保留括约肌手术并进行回肠转流造口的患者。前瞻性收集包括腹膜粘连指数(PAI)评分、手术时间、切除小肠长度、手术并发症及术后住院时间等变量,并在固定缝线组(AG)和非固定缝线组(NAG)之间进行比较。

结果

本研究共纳入90例患者,其中AG组60例,NAG组30例。与NAG组相比,AG组的平均手术时间较短(46.88±16.37分钟对61.53±19.36分钟,P = 0.001),平均PAI评分较低(3.02±2.53对5.80±2.60,P = 0.001)。AG组和NAG组术后并发症发生率无显著差异(分别为5.0%和13.3%;P = 0.240)。

结论

在形成回肠转流造口时放置固定缝线可降低回肠造口还纳时的粘连评分及手术时间,因此可能对改善围手术期结果有效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba02/8506021/aeb717bdd36a/astr-101-214-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of anchoring sutures at diverting ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery on peritoneal adhesion at following ileostomy reversal.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Oct;101(4):214-220. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.101.4.214. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
2
Risk factors for complications after diverting ileostomy closure in patients who have undergone rectal cancer surgery.
Surg Today. 2017 Oct;47(10):1238-1242. doi: 10.1007/s00595-017-1510-1. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
5
Loop ileostomy reversal after laparoscopic versus open rectal resection.
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Mar;89(3):E52-E55. doi: 10.1111/ans.14879. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
6
Morbidity and costs of diverting ileostomy in transanal total mesorectal excision with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer.
Tech Coloproctol. 2021 Oct;25(10):1133-1141. doi: 10.1007/s10151-021-02498-5. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk Factors for Postoperative Complications Following Diverting Loop Ileostomy Takedown.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec;21(12):2048-2055. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3567-y. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
2
Morbidities after closure of ileostomy: analysis of risk factors.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;31(1):51-7. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2327-2. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
Clinical practice guidelines for ostomy surgery.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Apr;58(4):375-87. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000347.
4
Diverting ileostomy in colorectal surgery: when is it necessary?
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Feb;400(2):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1275-1. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
7
Standardized postoperative pathway: accelerating recovery after ileostomy closure.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1786-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9399-9. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
8
A sprayable hydrogel adhesion barrier facilitates closure of defunctioning loop ileostomy: a randomized trial.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Jun;51(6):956-60. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9181-4. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
9
Morbidity of ostomy takedown.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Mar;12(3):437-41. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0457-8. Epub 2007 Dec 20.
10
Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 May;12(5):939-44. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0435-1. Epub 2007 Dec 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验