bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, Missouri, USA.
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2022 Jan 19;60(1):e0161021. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01610-21. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
The carbapenem/beta-lactamase inhibitor meropenem-vaborbactam (MEV) used to treat complicated urinary tract infections and pyelonephritis in adults was approved in 2017 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Here, we evaluated Vitek 2 MEV (bioMérieux, Durham, NC) compared to the reference broth microdilution (BMD) method. Of 449 Enterobacterales isolates analyzed per FDA/CLSI breakpoints, the overall performance was 98.2% essential agreement (EA), 98.7% category agreement (CA), and 0% very major errors (VME) or major errors (ME). For 438 FDA intended-for-use isolates, performance was 98.2% EA, 98.6% CA, and 0% VME or ME. Evaluable EA was 81.0%, but with only 42 on-scale evaluable results. Individual species demonstrated EA and CA rates of ≥90% without any VME or ME. When evaluated using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints, overall Vitek 2 MEV performance for and Pseudomonas aeruginosa demonstrated 97.3% EA, 99.2% CA, 2.3% VME, and 0.6% ME (after error resolution: 97.3% EA, 99.4% CA, 2.2% VME, and 0.4% ME) compared to the reference BMD method. Performance for P. aeruginosa included 92.2% EA, 97.4% CA, 0% VME, and 3.0% ME (after error resolution: 92.2% EA, 98.7% CA, 0% VME, and 1.5% ME). Performance for included 98.2% EA, 99.6% CA, 3.0% VME, and 0.2% ME. Evaluable EA was 80.6% but was based on only 67 evaluable results. These findings support Vitek 2 MEV as an accurate automated system for MEV susceptibility testing of and P. aeruginosa and could be an alternate solution to the manual-labor-intensive reference BMD method.
美罗培南-硼替佐米(MEV)是一种碳青霉烯/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂,用于治疗成人复杂性尿路感染和肾盂肾炎,2017 年获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准。在这里,我们评估了 Vitek 2 MEV(生物梅里埃,达勒姆,NC)与参考肉汤微量稀释(BMD)方法的比较。根据 FDA/CLSI 折点分析了 449 株肠杆菌科分离株,总体性能为 98.2%基本一致(EA),98.7%类别一致(CA),0%严重错误(VME)或主要错误(ME)。对于 438 株 FDA 预期用途的分离株,性能为 98.2% EA,98.6% CA,0% VME 或 ME。可评估 EA 为 81.0%,但仅有 42 个可评估结果。个别物种的 EA 和 CA 率均≥90%,无 VME 或 ME。当使用欧洲抗菌药物敏感性试验委员会(EUCAST)折点进行评估时,Vitek 2 MEV 对 和铜绿假单胞菌的总体性能为 97.3% EA,99.2% CA,2.3% VME 和 0.6% ME(错误解决后:97.3% EA,99.4% CA,2.2% VME 和 0.4% ME),与参考 BMD 方法相比。铜绿假单胞菌的性能包括 92.2% EA,97.4% CA,0% VME 和 3.0% ME(错误解决后:92.2% EA,98.7% CA,0% VME 和 1.5% ME)。肠杆菌科的性能为 98.2% EA,99.6% CA,3.0% VME 和 0.2% ME。可评估 EA 为 80.6%,但仅基于 67 个可评估结果。这些发现支持 Vitek 2 MEV 作为 MEV 对 和铜绿假单胞菌的敏感性测试的准确自动系统,并且可以作为手动劳动密集型参考 BMD 方法的替代方案。