Anton M, Reginatto M, Elster C, Mäder U, Schopphoven S, Sechopoulos I, van Engen R
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany.
Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences, Giessen, Germany.
Phys Med Biol. 2021 Nov 18;66(22). doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac33ea.
Currently, quality assurance measurements in mammography are performed on unprocessed images. For diagnosis, however, radiologists are provided with processed images. This image processing is optimised for images of human anatomy and therefore does not always perform satisfactorily with technical phantoms. To overcome this problem, it may be possible to use anthropomorphic phantoms reflecting the anatomic structure of the human breast in place of technical phantoms when carrying out task-specific quality assessment using model observers. However, the use of model observers is hampered by the fact that a large number of images needs to be acquired. A recently published novel observer called the regression detectability index (RDI) needs significantly fewer images, but requires the background of the images to be flat. Therefore, to be able to apply the RDI to images of anthropomorphic phantoms, the anatomic background needs to be removed. For this, a procedure in which the anatomical structures are fitted by thin plate spline (TPS) interpolation has been developed. When the object to be detected is small, such as a calcification-like lesion, it is shown that the anatomic background can be removed successfully by subtracting the TPS interpolation, which makes the background-free image accessible to the RDI. We have compared the detectability obtained by the RDI with TPS background subtraction to results of the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) and human observers. With the RDI, results for the detectabilityd'can be obtained using 75% fewer images compared to the CHO, while the same uncertainty ofd'is achieved. Furthermore, the correlation ofd'(RDI) with the results of human observers is at least as good as that ofd'(CHO) with human observers.
目前,乳腺X线摄影中的质量保证测量是在未处理的图像上进行的。然而,为了进行诊断,放射科医生得到的是处理后的图像。这种图像处理针对人体解剖结构的图像进行了优化,因此对于技术体模来说并不总是能令人满意地发挥作用。为了克服这个问题,在使用模型观察者进行特定任务的质量评估时,有可能使用反映人类乳房解剖结构的拟人化体模来代替技术体模。然而,模型观察者的使用受到需要采集大量图像这一事实的阻碍。最近发表的一种名为回归可检测性指数(RDI)的新型观察者所需的图像数量要少得多,但要求图像背景是平坦的。因此,为了能够将RDI应用于拟人化体模的图像,需要去除解剖背景。为此,已经开发了一种通过薄板样条(TPS)插值拟合解剖结构的程序。当待检测的物体很小时,例如钙化样病变,结果表明通过减去TPS插值可以成功去除解剖背景,这使得无背景图像可供RDI使用。我们将通过RDI减去TPS背景获得的可检测性结果与通道化霍特林观察者(CHO)和人类观察者的结果进行了比较。使用RDI时,与CHO相比,获得可检测性d'的结果所需的图像数量减少了75%,同时实现了相同的d'不确定性。此外,d'(RDI)与人类观察者结果的相关性至少与d'(CHO)与人类观察者结果的相关性一样好。