Suppr超能文献

头孢噻肟与去乙酰头孢噻肟相互作用的体外研究。

An in vitro study of the interaction between cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime.

作者信息

Winstanley T G, Spencer R C

出版信息

Drugs Exp Clin Res. 1986;12(12):967-71.

PMID:3471432
Abstract

The in vitro activities of cefotaxime (CTX), desacetylcefotaxime (DES), cefuroxime (CXM) and ceftizoxime (CTZ) were compared against 272 recent clinical isolates and the effect of CTX and DES in combination was studied using agar dilution checkerboards. CTX and CTZ had similar activity, inhibiting 90% of Escherichia coli, Proteus spp., Klebsiella spp. and Providence spp. at 0.0075 mg/l. Ninety percent of Enterobacter spp. and Serratia spp. were inhibited by 1 mg/l of CTX and CTZ. Ninety percent of staphylococci were inhibited by 4 mg/l of CTX, although CTZ was significantly less active against strains of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci had MICs for CTX of 32 and 128 mg/l respectively. DES had similar activity to CXM with MICs 2 to 5 dilutions less than CTX and CTZ. In checkerboard tests, synergy (FIC less than 0.5) between CTX and DES was demonstrated against 34% of isolates overall, with antagonism (FIC greater than 1) in 24%. CTX and DES were synergistic against 72% of staphylococci and 50% of enterococci. They were antagonistic against 81% of Enterobacter spp. and 62% of Serratia spp. although both species were susceptible to CTX alone. There was an additive effect or slight antagonism with 90% of Ps. aeruginosa. Other investigators have reported lower incidences of antagonism between CTX and DES: this could be due to variations among the collections of clinical isolates or methodologies used. The relevance of the in vitro interaction between CTX and its metabolite to the antimicrobial activity of CTX in vivo remains to be demonstrated.

摘要

比较了头孢噻肟(CTX)、去乙酰头孢噻肟(DES)、头孢呋辛(CXM)和头孢唑肟(CTZ)对272株近期临床分离菌株的体外活性,并使用琼脂稀释棋盘法研究了CTX和DES联合用药的效果。CTX和CTZ活性相似,在0.0075mg/L时可抑制90%的大肠杆菌、变形杆菌属、克雷伯菌属和普罗威登斯菌属。1mg/L的CTX和CTZ可抑制90%的肠杆菌属和沙雷菌属。4mg/L的CTX可抑制90%的葡萄球菌,不过CTZ对耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌菌株的活性明显较低。铜绿假单胞菌和肠球菌对CTX的MIC分别为32mg/L和128mg/L。DES与CXM活性相似,MIC比CTX和CTZ低2至5倍。在棋盘试验中,CTX和DES对总体34%的分离菌株表现出协同作用(FIC小于0.5),24%表现出拮抗作用(FIC大于1)。CTX和DES对72%的葡萄球菌和50%的肠球菌具有协同作用。它们对81%的肠杆菌属和62%的沙雷菌属具有拮抗作用,尽管这两个菌属单独对CTX敏感。对90%的铜绿假单胞菌有相加作用或轻微拮抗作用。其他研究者报道CTX和DES之间拮抗作用的发生率较低:这可能是由于临床分离菌株的收集或所用方法的差异。CTX与其代谢产物之间的体外相互作用与CTX体内抗菌活性的相关性仍有待证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验