Institute of Sound and Vibration Engineering (ISAVE), Hochschule Düsseldorf, Münsterstaße 156, Düsseldorf, 40476, Germany.
Audio Communication Group, Technische Univeristät Berlin, Einsteinufer 17c, Berlin, 10587, Germany.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2021 Oct;150(4):2539. doi: 10.1121/10.0006574.
Musicians and music professionals are often considered to be expert listeners for listening tests on room acoustics. However, these tests often target acoustic parameters other than those typically relevant in music such as pitch, rhythm, amplitude, or timbre. To assess the expertise in perceiving and understanding room acoustical phenomena, a listening test battery was constructed to measure the perceptual sensitivity and cognitive abilities in the identification of rooms with different reverberation times and different spectral envelopes. Performance in these tests was related to data from the Goldsmiths Musical Sophistication Index, self-reported previous experience in music recording and acoustics, and academic knowledge on acoustics. The data from 102 participants show that sensory and cognitive abilities are both correlated significantly with musical training, analytic listening skills, recording experience, and academic knowledge on acoustics, whereas general interest in and engagement with music do not show any significant correlations. The regression models, using only significantly correlated criteria of musicality and professional expertise, explain only small to moderate amounts (11%-28%) of the variance in the "room acoustic listening expertise" across the different tasks of the battery. Thus, the results suggest that the traditional criteria for selecting expert listeners in room acoustics are only weak predictors of their actual performances.
音乐家和音乐专业人士通常被认为是聆听房间声学测试的专家。然而,这些测试通常针对的是与音乐不相关的声学参数,如音高、节奏、幅度或音色。为了评估感知和理解房间声学现象的专业知识,构建了一个听力测试电池,以测量在不同混响时间和不同频谱包络的房间中识别的感知灵敏度和认知能力。这些测试的表现与来自 Goldsmiths 音乐复杂性指数的数据、以前在音乐录制和声学方面的经验、以及对声学的学术知识有关。来自 102 名参与者的数据表明,感官和认知能力都与音乐训练、分析聆听技巧、录音经验和声学学术知识显著相关,而对音乐的一般兴趣和参与度则没有显示出任何显著的相关性。使用仅与音乐性和专业知识相关的显著标准的回归模型,仅能解释电池中不同任务的“房间声学听力专业知识”的小到中等比例(11%-28%)的变化。因此,结果表明,在房间声学中选择专家听众的传统标准只是他们实际表现的弱预测因素。