Bénichou J, Lepage E, Chastang C
Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978). 1987;29(1):87-91.
In haematology, randomized clinical trials often use survival or disease-free interval as response criterion (censored data). For ethical reasons, interim analyses are usually performed, but these interim analyses lead to an increasing Type I error. Sequential methods allow for repeated testing. Three sequential methods are well-adapted to censored data: group sequential analysis, the sequential probability ratio test and the triangular test. The triangular test has the best properties: it allows an early termination of the trial whatever the difference between the treatment groups and without the risk of long duration trials. Sequential analyses can be performed at the same frequency as the usual interim analyses. These three sequential procedures have been applied to the analysis of two cooperative trials in haematology. It appears that the use of sequential methods has to be recommended in the design of randomized clinical trials with a censored response criterion.
在血液学中,随机临床试验通常将生存期或无病间期作为反应标准(删失数据)。出于伦理原因,通常会进行中期分析,但这些中期分析会导致I型错误增加。序贯方法允许重复检验。有三种序贯方法非常适合删失数据:成组序贯分析、序贯概率比检验和三角检验。三角检验具有最佳特性:无论治疗组之间的差异如何,它都能使试验提前终止,且不存在试验持续时间过长的风险。序贯分析可以与常规中期分析以相同的频率进行。这三种序贯方法已应用于两项血液学合作试验的分析。在设计具有删失反应标准的随机临床试验时,似乎推荐使用序贯方法。