Barry Rachelle, Stevens Craig A, Huynh Trina, Lerner Dmitri
University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.
University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
J Pharm Technol. 2021 Oct;37(5):225-233. doi: 10.1177/87551225211031923. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
Unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions are commonly managed with nurse-driven nomograms titrated to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In some patients, anti-Xa values may be more appropriate measures of anticoagulation. At the present institution, an update to the nurse-driven aPTT nomogram requires pharmacist notification and clinical assessment for critically supratherapeutic aPTT results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the nomogram update. A single-center, retrospective, pre-post analysis was conducted in patients treated with UFH who experienced a critical aPTT during the 6 months preceding and following the nomogram update. Patients with erroneous critical aPTT results were excluded. The primary endpoint was the time in therapeutic range (Rosendaal method) from the first critical aPTT until UFH discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients transitioned to anti-Xa monitoring and the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, 5 bleeding. Data were analyzed by the χ test. The study was institutional review board approved. Of 277 UFH infusions, 142 belonged to the pre-implementation group and 135 to the post-implementation group. Baseline aPTTs were similar between the 2 groups. Time in therapeutic range was 58.1% versus 62.4% of between groups ( = .467). UFH was transitioned to pharmacist-driven anti-Xa monitoring in 16.2% versus 40.3% of patients ( < .001). BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding occurred in 23.2% versus 13.4% of patients ( < .001). Application of these data suggest improved safety and efficacy outcomes with directed pharmacist management of UFH in patients with critically elevated aPTTs.
普通肝素(UFH)输注通常通过根据活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)进行滴定的护士主导的列线图来管理。在一些患者中,抗Xa值可能是更合适的抗凝指标。在本机构,护士主导的aPTT列线图的更新需要药剂师告知并对严重超治疗范围的aPTT结果进行临床评估。本研究的目的是评估列线图更新的有效性和安全性。对在列线图更新前后6个月内接受UFH治疗且出现危急aPTT的患者进行了单中心、回顾性、前后分析。排除aPTT结果错误的患者。主要终点是从首次危急aPTT到UFH停用期间处于治疗范围内的时间(罗森达尔法)。次要终点包括转为抗Xa监测的患者比例以及出血学术研究联盟(BARC)2、3、5级出血的发生率。数据通过χ检验进行分析。该研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。在277例UFH输注中,142例属于实施前组,135例属于实施后组。两组之间的基线aPTT相似。治疗范围内的时间在两组之间分别为58.1%和62.4%(P = 0.467)。16.2%的患者转为由药剂师主导的抗Xa监测,而实施后组为40.3%(P < 0.001)。BARC 2、3、5级出血分别发生在23.2%和13.4%的患者中(P < 0.001)。这些数据的应用表明,对于aPTT严重升高的患者,由药剂师直接管理UFH可改善安全性和有效性结果。