Suppr超能文献

标准化药师干预对肝素输注时活化部分凝血活酶时间临界值的影响。

Impact of Protocolized Pharmacist Intervention on Critical Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values With Heparin Infusions.

作者信息

Barry Rachelle, Stevens Craig A, Huynh Trina, Lerner Dmitri

机构信息

University of California, Davis Health, Sacramento, CA, USA.

University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Pharm Technol. 2021 Oct;37(5):225-233. doi: 10.1177/87551225211031923. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

Abstract

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) infusions are commonly managed with nurse-driven nomograms titrated to activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). In some patients, anti-Xa values may be more appropriate measures of anticoagulation. At the present institution, an update to the nurse-driven aPTT nomogram requires pharmacist notification and clinical assessment for critically supratherapeutic aPTT results. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the nomogram update. A single-center, retrospective, pre-post analysis was conducted in patients treated with UFH who experienced a critical aPTT during the 6 months preceding and following the nomogram update. Patients with erroneous critical aPTT results were excluded. The primary endpoint was the time in therapeutic range (Rosendaal method) from the first critical aPTT until UFH discontinuation. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of patients transitioned to anti-Xa monitoring and the incidence of Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3, 5 bleeding. Data were analyzed by the χ test. The study was institutional review board approved. Of 277 UFH infusions, 142 belonged to the pre-implementation group and 135 to the post-implementation group. Baseline aPTTs were similar between the 2 groups. Time in therapeutic range was 58.1% versus 62.4% of between groups ( = .467). UFH was transitioned to pharmacist-driven anti-Xa monitoring in 16.2% versus 40.3% of patients ( < .001). BARC 2, 3, 5 bleeding occurred in 23.2% versus 13.4% of patients ( < .001). Application of these data suggest improved safety and efficacy outcomes with directed pharmacist management of UFH in patients with critically elevated aPTTs.

摘要

普通肝素(UFH)输注通常通过根据活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)进行滴定的护士主导的列线图来管理。在一些患者中,抗Xa值可能是更合适的抗凝指标。在本机构,护士主导的aPTT列线图的更新需要药剂师告知并对严重超治疗范围的aPTT结果进行临床评估。本研究的目的是评估列线图更新的有效性和安全性。对在列线图更新前后6个月内接受UFH治疗且出现危急aPTT的患者进行了单中心、回顾性、前后分析。排除aPTT结果错误的患者。主要终点是从首次危急aPTT到UFH停用期间处于治疗范围内的时间(罗森达尔法)。次要终点包括转为抗Xa监测的患者比例以及出血学术研究联盟(BARC)2、3、5级出血的发生率。数据通过χ检验进行分析。该研究获得了机构审查委员会的批准。在277例UFH输注中,142例属于实施前组,135例属于实施后组。两组之间的基线aPTT相似。治疗范围内的时间在两组之间分别为58.1%和62.4%(P = 0.467)。16.2%的患者转为由药剂师主导的抗Xa监测,而实施后组为40.3%(P < 0.001)。BARC 2、3、5级出血分别发生在23.2%和13.4%的患者中(P < 0.001)。这些数据的应用表明,对于aPTT严重升高的患者,由药剂师直接管理UFH可改善安全性和有效性结果。

相似文献

1
Impact of Protocolized Pharmacist Intervention on Critical Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time Values With Heparin Infusions.
J Pharm Technol. 2021 Oct;37(5):225-233. doi: 10.1177/87551225211031923. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
5
Establishing a new target range for unfractionated heparin for acute coronary syndromes.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2004 Apr;17(2):121-6. doi: 10.1023/B:THRO.0000037667.52940.64.
8
Antifactor Xa levels vs. activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. A pilot study.
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Oct;41(5):499-502. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12415. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Clinical outcomes with unfractionated heparin monitored by anti-factor Xa vs. activated partial Thromboplastin time.
Am J Hematol. 2019 Sep;94(9):1015-1019. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25565. Epub 2019 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

2
Time in the Therapeutic Range for Assessing Anticoagulation Quality in Patients Receiving Continuous Unfractionated Heparin.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Dec;24(9_suppl):178S-181S. doi: 10.1177/1076029618798944. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
3
Evaluation of Compliance with a Weight-based Nurse-driven Heparin Nomogram in a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2018 Jun;17(2):83-87. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000113.
4
Influence of Direct Oral Anticoagulants on Anti-Factor Xa Measurements Utilized for Monitoring Heparin.
Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Feb;52(2):154-159. doi: 10.1177/1060028017729481. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
5
Description and Evaluation of the Implementation of a Weight-Based, Nurse-Driven Heparin Nomogram in a Tertiary Academic Medical Center.
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2018 Mar;24(2):248-253. doi: 10.1177/1076029617721009. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
6
The impact of pharmacy monitoring and intervention in patients receiving intravenous heparin.
Int J Clin Pharm. 2017 Aug;39(4):844-850. doi: 10.1007/s11096-017-0482-y. Epub 2017 May 15.
7
Heparin: Past, Present, and Future.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2016 Jul 4;9(3):38. doi: 10.3390/ph9030038.
8
Clinical Scenarios for Discordant Anti-Xa.
Adv Hematol. 2016;2016:4054806. doi: 10.1155/2016/4054806. Epub 2016 May 12.
9
Guidance for the practical management of the heparin anticoagulants in the treatment of venous thromboembolism.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Jan;41(1):165-86. doi: 10.1007/s11239-015-1315-2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验