Cohen Dan, Slawaska-Eng David, Almasri Mahmoud, Sheean Andrew, de Sa Darren
Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mercy Health - Cincinnati Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2021 Dec;14(6):462-474. doi: 10.1007/s12178-021-09726-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
The purpose of this review is to provide an up-to-date summary on the most recent literature examining techniques and outcomes in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using quadriceps tendon (QT) which will enable surgeons to make well informed evidence-based decisions when choosing a particular graft option and technique in ACL reconstruction.
Several RCTs and systematic reviews have been published recently on this topic, and overall, there were no differences found between the QT, HT, and BPTB groups in patient-reported outcomes, stability testing, or graft re-rupture rates. In terms of strength testing, the QT group did have inferior knee extensor strength on isokinetic testing when compared to the HT group, whereas the HT group had inferior knee flexor strength compared to the QT group. No differences were found on strength testing between the QT and BPTB groups. Currently, two large RCTs, the Stability2 and SQuASH trials, are ongoing examining the effectiveness of the QT vs BPTB with or without LET and QT vs HT in the pediatric population which will help shed further light on the effectiveness of the QT as a graft choice in ACL reconstruction. The findings of this scoping review demonstrate that the QT is an excellent graft option in ACL reconstruction both in the primary and revision settings, among adult and pediatric populations. This review provides surgeons with further assurance when selecting QT autograft in ACL reconstruction.
本综述旨在提供最新的文献总结,内容涉及使用股四头肌肌腱(QT)进行前交叉韧带(ACL)重建的技术及结果,这将使外科医生在选择ACL重建的特定移植物选项和技术时,能够基于充分的证据做出明智的决策。
最近发表了几项关于该主题的随机对照试验(RCT)和系统评价,总体而言,在患者报告的结果、稳定性测试或移植物再破裂率方面,QT组、半腱肌肌腱(HT)组和髌腱骨-髌腱-骨(BPTB)组之间未发现差异。在力量测试方面,与HT组相比,QT组在等速测试中的膝关节伸肌力量较差,而与QT组相比,HT组的膝关节屈肌力量较差。QT组和BPTB组在力量测试方面未发现差异。目前,两项大型RCT,即Stability2和SQuASH试验正在进行,以研究QT与BPTB在有或无局部增强技术(LET)情况下以及QT与HT在儿科人群中的有效性,这将有助于进一步阐明QT作为ACL重建移植物选择的有效性。本范围综述的结果表明,在成人和儿科人群的初次和翻修手术中,QT都是ACL重建的优秀移植物选择。本综述为外科医生在ACL重建中选择QT自体移植物提供了进一步的依据。