Am Nat. 2021 Dec;198(6):759-771. doi: 10.1086/716895. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
AbstractAn ecological issue can best be studied by gathering original data that are specifically targeted for that issue. But ascertaining-a priori-whether a novel issue will be worth exploring can be problematic without background data. However, an issue's potential merit can sometimes be evaluated by repurposing legacy or other data that had been gathered for unrelated purposes but that are nonetheless relevant. Our present project was initially motivated by an ecological trade-off-proposed eight decades ago-involving the depth at which desert reptiles overwintered. To address those and related issues, we repurposed our five-decades-old natural history data for 18 species of Kgalagadi lizards and then explored the seasonal ecology of these lizards, emphasizing winter. Our data were not gathered for a study of seasonal ecology but nonetheless inform diverse seasonal patterns for a major community of lizards. However, repurposed data (whether recent or legacy) present challenges and ambiguities, and we suggest targeted, next-step studies of seasonal ecology that can circumvent limitations and ambiguities.
摘要
通过收集专门针对该问题的原始数据,可以最好地研究生态问题。但是,如果没有背景数据,就很难事先确定一个新问题是否值得探索。然而,有时可以通过重新利用为其他目的收集的遗留数据或其他数据来评估问题的潜在价值,尽管这些数据与目标问题无关,但仍然相关。我们目前的项目最初是由一个 80 年前提出的生态权衡问题引发的,该问题涉及沙漠爬行动物越冬的深度。为了解决这些问题和相关问题,我们重新利用了我们 50 年来收集的 18 种喀拉哈里蜥蜴的自然历史数据,然后探索了这些蜥蜴的季节性生态,重点是冬季。我们的数据不是为季节性生态学研究收集的,但仍然为蜥蜴的一个主要群体提供了多样化的季节性模式信息。然而,重新利用的数据(无论是最近的还是遗留的数据)都存在挑战和模糊性,我们建议进行有针对性的、下一步的季节性生态学研究,可以规避限制和模糊性。