Suppr超能文献

人乳头瘤病毒联合检测在宫颈癌筛查中的应用差异:个体、提供者、医疗机构和医疗保健系统特征。

Variation in the receipt of human papilloma virus co-testing for cervical screening: Individual, provider, facility and healthcare system characteristics.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.

Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106871. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106871. Epub 2021 Nov 8.

Abstract

Since 2012, cervical cancer screening guidelines allow for choice of screening test for women age 30-65 years (i.e., Pap every 3 years or Pap with human papillomavirus co-testing every 5 years). Intended to give patients and providers options, this flexibility reflects a trend in the growing complexity of screening guidelines. Our objective was to characterize variation in cervical screening at the individual, provider, clinic/facility, and healthcare system levels. The analysis included 296,924 individuals receiving screening from 3626 providers at 136 clinics/facilities in three healthcare systems, 2010 to 2017. Main outcome was receipt of co-testing vs. Pap alone. Co-testing was more common in one healthcare system before the 2012 guidelines (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of co-testing at the other systems relative to this system 0.00 and 0.50) but was increasingly implemented over time in a second with declining uptake in the third (2017: AORs shifted to 7.32 and 0.01). Despite system-level differences, there was greater heterogeneity in receipt of co-testing associated with providers than clinics/facilities. In the three healthcare systems, providers in the highest quartile of co-testing use had an 8.35, 8.81, and 25.05-times greater odds of providing a co-test to women with the same characteristics relative to the lowest quartile. Similarly, clinics/ facilities in the highest quartile of co-testing use had a 4.20, 3.14, and 6.56-times greater odds of providing a co-test relative to the lowest quartile. Variation in screening test use is associated with health system, provider, and clinic/facility levels even after accounting for patient characteristics.

摘要

自 2012 年以来,宫颈癌筛查指南允许 30-65 岁女性选择筛查方法(即每 3 年进行巴氏涂片检查或每 5 年进行巴氏涂片检查联合人乳头瘤病毒检测)。这种灵活性旨在为患者和医生提供更多选择,反映了筛查指南日益复杂化的趋势。我们的目的是描述个体、医生、诊所/医疗机构和医疗保健系统各个层面的宫颈癌筛查差异。该分析包括 2010 年至 2017 年,来自三个医疗系统的 136 个诊所/医疗机构的 3626 名医生为 296924 名接受筛查的个体提供的信息。主要结果是接受联合检测与单独巴氏涂片检查的情况。在 2012 年指南之前,在一个医疗系统中,联合检测更为常见(与该系统相比,其他两个系统接受联合检测的调整优势比分别为 0.00 和 0.50),但随着时间的推移,第二个系统中的联合检测逐渐普及,而第三个系统中的联合检测则逐渐减少(2017 年:调整优势比分别转为 7.32 和 0.01)。尽管存在系统层面的差异,但与诊所/医疗机构相比,医生层面的联合检测差异更大。在三个医疗系统中,联合检测使用率最高的医生为与使用率最低的医生相比,为具有相同特征的女性提供联合检测的可能性高 8.35、8.81 和 25.05 倍。同样,联合检测使用率最高的诊所/医疗机构与使用率最低的诊所/医疗机构相比,为女性提供联合检测的可能性高 4.20、3.14 和 6.56 倍。即使考虑到患者特征,筛查检测方法的使用差异仍与医疗系统、医生和诊所/医疗机构层面有关。

相似文献

4
The Clinical and Economic Benefits of Co-Testing Versus Primary HPV Testing for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Modeling Analysis.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;25(6):606-16. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2015.5708. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
5
Benefits and costs of using HPV testing to screen for cervical cancer.
JAMA. 2002 May 8;287(18):2372-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.18.2372.
6
Organised screening for cervical cancer in France: a cost-effectiveness assessment.
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 6;7(10):e014626. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014626.
8
Prevalence and determinants of cervical cancer screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus testing.
Ann Epidemiol. 2019 Aug;36:40-47. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.06.002. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
10
Cervical Screening and Colposcopy Management of Women Age 24 and Under.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020 Dec;42(12):1518-1524. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2020.06.013. Epub 2020 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to the Equitable Implementation of Risk-Based Cervical Cancer Management Guidelines.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09611-6.
2
Delivering Guideline-Concordant Care for Patients With High-Risk HPV and Normal Cytologic Findings.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2454969. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54969.
4
Cervical cancer screening rates in females living with HIV at three healthcare settings in the United States, 2010-2019.
Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Mar;36(3):275-284. doi: 10.1007/s10552-024-01937-6. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Sep;70(5):321-346. doi: 10.3322/caac.21628. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
3
Trends Over Time in Pap and Pap-HPV Cotesting for Cervical Cancer Screening.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Feb;28(2):244-249. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7380. Epub 2019 Jan 7.
4
Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort.
Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 15;144(6):1460-1473. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31940. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
5
Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.
JAMA. 2018 Aug 21;320(7):674-686. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.10897.
6
Multi-level Influences on Breast Cancer Screening in Primary Care.
J Gen Intern Med. 2018 Oct;33(10):1729-1737. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4560-1. Epub 2018 Aug 3.
7
Assessment of trends in cervical cancer screening rates using healthcare claims data: United States, 2003-2014.
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Feb 2;9:124-130. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.01.010. eCollection 2018 Mar.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验