Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Biostatistics Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Prev Med. 2022 Jan;154:106871. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106871. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
Since 2012, cervical cancer screening guidelines allow for choice of screening test for women age 30-65 years (i.e., Pap every 3 years or Pap with human papillomavirus co-testing every 5 years). Intended to give patients and providers options, this flexibility reflects a trend in the growing complexity of screening guidelines. Our objective was to characterize variation in cervical screening at the individual, provider, clinic/facility, and healthcare system levels. The analysis included 296,924 individuals receiving screening from 3626 providers at 136 clinics/facilities in three healthcare systems, 2010 to 2017. Main outcome was receipt of co-testing vs. Pap alone. Co-testing was more common in one healthcare system before the 2012 guidelines (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of co-testing at the other systems relative to this system 0.00 and 0.50) but was increasingly implemented over time in a second with declining uptake in the third (2017: AORs shifted to 7.32 and 0.01). Despite system-level differences, there was greater heterogeneity in receipt of co-testing associated with providers than clinics/facilities. In the three healthcare systems, providers in the highest quartile of co-testing use had an 8.35, 8.81, and 25.05-times greater odds of providing a co-test to women with the same characteristics relative to the lowest quartile. Similarly, clinics/ facilities in the highest quartile of co-testing use had a 4.20, 3.14, and 6.56-times greater odds of providing a co-test relative to the lowest quartile. Variation in screening test use is associated with health system, provider, and clinic/facility levels even after accounting for patient characteristics.
自 2012 年以来,宫颈癌筛查指南允许 30-65 岁女性选择筛查方法(即每 3 年进行巴氏涂片检查或每 5 年进行巴氏涂片检查联合人乳头瘤病毒检测)。这种灵活性旨在为患者和医生提供更多选择,反映了筛查指南日益复杂化的趋势。我们的目的是描述个体、医生、诊所/医疗机构和医疗保健系统各个层面的宫颈癌筛查差异。该分析包括 2010 年至 2017 年,来自三个医疗系统的 136 个诊所/医疗机构的 3626 名医生为 296924 名接受筛查的个体提供的信息。主要结果是接受联合检测与单独巴氏涂片检查的情况。在 2012 年指南之前,在一个医疗系统中,联合检测更为常见(与该系统相比,其他两个系统接受联合检测的调整优势比分别为 0.00 和 0.50),但随着时间的推移,第二个系统中的联合检测逐渐普及,而第三个系统中的联合检测则逐渐减少(2017 年:调整优势比分别转为 7.32 和 0.01)。尽管存在系统层面的差异,但与诊所/医疗机构相比,医生层面的联合检测差异更大。在三个医疗系统中,联合检测使用率最高的医生为与使用率最低的医生相比,为具有相同特征的女性提供联合检测的可能性高 8.35、8.81 和 25.05 倍。同样,联合检测使用率最高的诊所/医疗机构与使用率最低的诊所/医疗机构相比,为女性提供联合检测的可能性高 4.20、3.14 和 6.56 倍。即使考虑到患者特征,筛查检测方法的使用差异仍与医疗系统、医生和诊所/医疗机构层面有关。