• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

系统评价和荟萃分析连续脑积液引流对围手术期锁孔手术的影响。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage on keyhole surgery during the perioperative period.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China; Chinese Academy of Sciences Sichuan Translational Medicine Research Hospital, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Oct;10(10):11129-11140. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2728.

DOI:10.21037/apm-21-2728
PMID:34763473
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lumbar continuous drainage of fluid (LCDF) has become more widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of neurological diseases in recent years. The use of LCDF can enable a better understanding of the patient's condition and reduce the incidence of related complications. LCDF can also affect complications of perforation surgery, including mortality during hospitalization, cerebral vasospasm (CVS), bleeding, and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH).

METHODS

Articles published from library construction to April 2021 were searched for in the English-language databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with LCDF and hole locking surgery were meta-analyzed using the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs involving 1,092 patients (continuous drainage group, n=585; control group, n=507) were included in the meta-analysis. For the statistical different in incidence of perioperative cerebral infarction in the two groups, the odds ratio (OR) was 5.42 [95% confidence interval (CI): (2.71, 10.83); P<0.00001], and for the statistical difference in the incidence of cerebral hemorrhage, the OR was 4.76 [95% CI: (2.11, 10.76); P=0.0002]. Perioperative complications were fewer in the LCDF-treated drainage group than in the conventional group.

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis of 10 RCTs confirmed that LCDF compared with other treatments is associated with a lower incidence of perioperative complications, such as cerebral hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, and cerebral infarction, as well as increased Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS).

摘要

背景

近年来,腰椎持续引流(LCDF)在神经科疾病的诊断和治疗中得到了更广泛的应用。使用 LCDF 可以更好地了解患者的病情,并降低相关并发症的发生率。LCDF 还会影响穿孔手术的并发症,包括住院期间的死亡率、脑血管痉挛(CVS)、出血和脑动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(aSAH)。

方法

在 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和 Embase 英文数据库中检索了从图书馆建设到 2021 年 4 月发表的文章。使用 Cochrane 协作的 RevMan 5.3 软件对所有使用 LCDF 和孔锁手术的随机对照试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了 10 项 RCT,共 1092 例患者(持续引流组,n=585;对照组,n=507)进行荟萃分析。对于两组围手术期脑梗死发生率的统计学差异,比值比(OR)为 5.42 [95%置信区间(CI):(2.71,10.83);P<0.00001],对于脑出血发生率的统计学差异,OR 为 4.76 [95% CI:(2.11,10.76);P=0.0002]。LCDF 治疗引流组的围手术期并发症少于常规组。

讨论

这项对 10 项 RCT 的荟萃分析证实,与其他治疗方法相比,LCDF 与较低的围手术期并发症发生率相关,如脑出血、脑积水和脑梗死,以及格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)的提高。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of continuous cerebrospinal fluid drainage on keyhole surgery during the perioperative period.系统评价和荟萃分析连续脑积液引流对围手术期锁孔手术的影响。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Oct;10(10):11129-11140. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-2728.
2
The Benefits and Feasibility of External Lumbar Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage for Cerebral Vasospasm in Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis.《动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后脑血管痉挛患者行外部腰椎脑脊液引流的获益和可行性:Meta 分析和序贯试验分析》。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e549-e560. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.08.044. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
3
Effectiveness of Cerebrospinal Fluid Lumbar Drainage Among Patients with Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者脑脊液腰大池引流的有效性:一项更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:246-253.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.01.062. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
4
The effectiveness of lumbar cerebrospinal fluid drainage in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage with different bleeding amounts.不同出血量的颅内动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者行腰椎脑脊液引流的效果。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Apr;43(2):739-747. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01116-1. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
5
Effect of statin treatment on vasospasm-related morbidity and functional outcome in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.他汀类药物治疗对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者血管痉挛相关发病率和功能结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg. 2017 Aug;127(2):291-301. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.JNS152900. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
6
Marked reduction of cerebral vasospasm with lumbar drainage of cerebrospinal fluid after subarachnoid hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血后通过脑脊液腰椎引流显著减轻脑血管痉挛。
J Neurosurg. 2004 Feb;100(2):215-24. doi: 10.3171/jns.2004.100.2.0215.
7
Effect of the drainage of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with aneurismal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A meta-analysis.动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者脑脊液引流的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Oct;95(41):e5140. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005140.
8
Early permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: does a lower rate of nosocomial meningitis outweigh the risk of delayed cerebral vasospasm related morbidity?动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者早期行永久性脑脊液分流术:降低院内脑膜炎发生率的获益是否大于延迟性脑血管痉挛相关发病率增加的风险?
Neurol Res. 2021 Jan;43(1):40-53. doi: 10.1080/01616412.2020.1819091. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of cerebrospinal fluid drainage and lumbar puncture in the treatment of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after craniocerebral injury.脑脊液引流和腰椎穿刺治疗颅脑损伤后脑脊液漏疗效及安全性的系统评价与Meta分析
Ann Palliat Med. 2023 Jan;12(1):121-132. doi: 10.21037/apm-22-1302.
10
Choice for the removal of bloody cerebrospinal fluid in postcoiling aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: external ventricular drainage or lumbar drainage?血管内栓塞术后动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血时血性脑脊液清除的选择:脑室外引流还是腰椎引流?
Turk Neurosurg. 2014;24(5):737-44. doi: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.9837-13.2.